My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/29/2020 EB Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Environmental Board
>
Packets
>
2020
>
04/29/2020 EB Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2021 2:57:26 PM
Creation date
4/24/2020 11:18:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Environmental Board
Env Bd Document Type
Env Bd Packet
Meeting Date
04/29/2020
Env Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment <br />Response <br />2. As part of the long-term planning process, the <br />City of Lino Lakes is anticipating the future need <br />for 80th Street to connect to the west. The <br />Michael Grochala, City of Lino Lakes <br />March 13, 2020 <br />planned timing for this connection is post 2040. <br />Page 2 <br />The City recognizes the need to begin this <br />9. Land Use 111, Water Resources 113. Fish, wildlife, etc. (Lmmett Mullin, 651-602- <br />dialogue between the Met Council and Anoka <br />The proposed mitigation measures of a westward extension of 80th Street (County Road <br />Thep <br />County and therefore has indicated this future <br />140) and an interchange with 1-35W does not conform to the 2040 Regional Parks Policy <br />road connection in its transportation plan and in <br />Plan. The Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is owned and operated by Anoka 2. <br />❑ <br />this AUAR. This project could be subject to a <br />County and has a Metropolitan Council -approved master plan that was originally <br />developed in 1975 and revised in 1999. In 2003, 2012, and 2013, the master plan was <br />separate environmental review process and <br />amended to adjust the boundaries of the park reserve to what is existing today. The <br />would be evaluated for environmental review at <br />5,300 acre Rice Creek Chain of Lakes Park Reserve is one of the largest in the seven- <br />that time. <br />county metropolitan area and contains some of the most significant native wildlife habitat <br />and water resources in the region. It is also rich in cultural resources with several known <br />significant archaeological sites within its boundary, <br />3. We understand that these improvements are <br />not identified by Met Council 2040 Transportation <br />The original AUAR acknowledges that the proposed transportation improvements would <br />have impacts on the Park Reserve, However, it asserts that these mitigation measures <br />Policy Plan. However, the City has identified the <br />would have lesser impacts than an alternative of increasing the capacity of CSAH 14 <br />improvements in the current 2040 <br />(Main Street). Council staff believe that there has been insufficient study of alternatives <br />Comprehensive Plan update in the "Post-2040" <br />to make this determination. <br />conditions. It is also understood that as the area <br />18. Traffic and Transportation l Appendix E (Russ Owen, 651-602-1724) <br />develops these improvements or other <br />As with the original AUAR, the proposed mitigation of transportation demand includes a <br />improvements would be considered. If <br />proposed westward expansion of 80th Street (County Road 140) through Rice Creek <br />Chain of Lakes Regional Park Reserve, including new interchanges of this roadway at I- <br />environmental review for the future roadway <br />35E and 1-35W. These interchanges are not included in either the current or increased 3. <br />❑ <br />connection is required, it will be completed at that <br />revenue scenarios of the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. The likelihood of an <br />time. <br />interchange at 1-35W are diminished by potential findings in an Environmental Impact <br />Statement for the interchange, which would inevitably include both Section 4(f) and <br />Section 6(f) evaluation. Although the original AUAR acknoweeged the need for further <br />environmental review required by state and federal agencies, the mitigation plan should <br />consider alternative local and regional connections that do not have such obvious <br />environmental constraints or programmatic obstacles. <br />If you have any questions or need further information, please contact the listed technical <br />reviewer or Michael Larson, Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1407. <br />Sincerely, <br />LisaBe Baraj , Director <br />Community D elopment Divisi <br />CC', Minnesota Environmental Quality Board <br />Todd Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division <br />Susan Vento, Metropolitan Council District No 11 <br />Michael Larson, Sector Representative / Principal Reviewer <br />Raya Esmaehi, Reviews Coordinator <br />N:ICammi7ev4LPAICammunitieslLrno LakeslLefterslbno Lakes 2020 AUAR 135E Corridor 19523 5.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.