Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />APPROVED <br />282 - High architectural standards included; <br />283 - Three sections of trail will be constructed with this development; <br />284 - Standard development agreement (3Td Addition is broken into phases due to pandemic <br />285 situation); <br />Advisory board review and approval; <br />287 - Actions requested by the council. <br />288 Mayor Rafferty noted that he visited the area and he sees great progress and it looks as if it will be a <br />289 very nice development. <br />290 Councilmember Stoesz asked if this action will approve both Phase 3A and 3B of the 3rd Addition. <br />291 Ms. Larsen concurred that both would be approved. <br />292 Councilmember Lyden received information on the number of lots included in Phase 3. He noted <br />293 that with all the lots included in this phase of the development, there is not one odd sized one. <br />294 i. Consider Resolution No. 20-30, Approving PUD Final Plan/Final Plat <br />295 Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-30 as presented. Council Member <br />296 Stoesz seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none <br />297Consider Resolution No. 20-31, Approving Development Agreement <br />298 Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 20-31 as presented. Council Member <br />299 Ruhland seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none <br />300 <br />301 6D) Consider Resolution No. 2046, Approving I-35E AUAR Update <br />302 Community Development Director Grochala explained the document, which is environmental in <br />303 nature and covers a study area of 45 acres dating back to ZOOS. Updates have occurred. There <br />304 have been projects in the corridor (map shown). This AUAR set up a conservation design <br />305 framework in the area of 35E. He explained what is examined and reviewed as part of the AUAR. <br />306 Different scenarios are allowed and have been considered (three scenarios noted). He noted a <br />307 development in the area that was able to proceed without environmental review because it was <br />308 already done through this document. He explained how the plan has been updated. Comments are <br />309 sought and have been received and included in the Appendix; changes were incorporated where <br />310 applicable. The Environmental Board has recommended approval. <br />311 Councilmember Lyden asked, looking at land use, what is the opinion on business campus versus <br />312 industrial and is there flexibility. Also what makes up the greenways along the freeway? Mr. <br />313 Grochala noted that the business campus classification is new to the comp plan and it would be <br />314 business/industry related such as technology; they still try to cast a wide net. Mr. Grochala pointed <br />315 out that the comp plan will still guide development. The greenway could be different things — <br />316 trails, greenspace, stormwater, etc. <br />317 Councilmember Stoesz noted Appendix F; will that be too restrictive. Community Development <br />318 Director Grochala noted that the appendix is a required element and it identifies elements and what <br />319 how they should be handled. <br />320 Council Member Cavegn moved to approve Resolution No. 2046 as presented. Council Member <br />321 Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried: Yeas, 5; Nays none <br />322 <br />8 <br />