My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-07-2020 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1999-2020 Park Board Packets
>
2020 Park Board Packets
>
10-07-2020 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2023 7:22:25 PM
Creation date
10/2/2020 3:01:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/07/2020
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft October 2, 2020 <br /> DeGardner stated that the City acquired the property in the 90 ' s not knowing what would <br /> happen in the area with the rest of the trails and connections. He stated that there is no <br /> current or fixture public purpose for the property. Huelman agreed and stated that it is not <br /> in the best interest of the City to maintain a property that is not a benefit to the whole <br /> community. <br /> j <br /> Roering stated that he had put in the retaining wall for his property expecting that the trail <br /> would go in. He stated that they had spent $4,500 on the retaining wall . He continued that <br /> I if he didn 't have the retaining wall he would not have a problem getting into his <br /> backyard. DeGardner stated that City approved the construction on properties based on <br /> what the builder submits as their plan. The City approved the building and grading plan <br /> when the plans were submitted. There is correspondence from June, 1996 between the <br /> City Engineer and the Builder stating that the basement elevation was too high and didn' t <br /> conform to the preliminary grading plan. Therefore, the builder included plans for the <br /> retaining wall. <br /> Gooder stated that it sounded like the Park Board is in favor of vacating the land <br /> (dividing it between property owners) and that neither owner planned to install a fence <br /> that would prevent rear yard access for either property owner. Norton stated that he was <br /> in favor of the City vacating the property. Roering stated he was in favor of the City <br /> vacating the property. <br /> Huelman asked for a motion to vacate the land. Gooder made the motion, Nordlund <br /> seconded it. Motioned passed by all Park Board Members voting to vacate the land. <br /> Recommendation will be made to City Council to vacate the land . <br /> 7. Park Updates : <br /> A. Woods Edge Park <br /> Rick DeGardner, Director of Public Services, updated the Park Board on Woods Edge <br /> Park. He stated that Woods Edge Park is a neighborhood park adjacent to the YMCA on <br /> regional park property . This park creates a more "natural" type feel that aesthetically fits <br /> with the natural surroundings. In June, parks staff (along with a certified playground <br /> installer) installed the playground equipment. The engineered wood fiber was delivered <br /> the following week . Parks Department staff will continue to create natural play elements <br /> including a fort building area, log balance beams, and wooden steps. The playground is <br /> currently open for public use. <br /> Park Board Members commented that the park looked good and John Nordlund, Park <br /> Board Member, stated that he visited the park about a week ago and the wood logs are <br /> now at the park. <br /> B . 121h Avenue Trail Update: <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.