My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/14/2020 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2020
>
10/14/2020 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2021 3:15:01 PM
Creation date
10/9/2020 12:02:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/14/2020
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning and Setback Requirements <br />The house was constructed in 1987. The property was zoned RX, Executive Rural at that time. <br />Per the 1983 Zoning Ordinance, the side yard setback for accessory structures was 5 ft. City <br />Zoning Ordinance dating back to 1971 also required a 5 ft side yard setback. <br />The property is currently zoned R-X, Rural Executive. Decks are considered accessory <br />structures and subject to accessory building setback requirements. Per Section 1007.080(2)(c) <br />Setbacks, the required side yard setback for an accessory building (i.e. deck) is five (5) feet. The <br />variance request would be for 2.7 feet. <br />The applicant states the existing side deck was constructed by the original property owners <br />between 1987 and 1991 approximately one (1) foot from the side lot line. The City has no <br />record of a building permit for the deck. In the late 1990's, the applicant remodeled the side <br />deck to its current setback location of 2.3 ft from the east lot line. The City has no record of a <br />building permit for the remodeled deck either. <br />Unfortunately, neither the original deck nor remodeled deck was legally constructed because it <br />did not meet the 5 ft side yard setback. The deck cannot be considered legal non -conforming and <br />should not be repaired or replaced as is currently located. <br />Option <br />The applicant may construct a 5 ft wide deck "walkway" and stair case from the side of the <br />house to access the rear deck. Staff appreciates the applicant's desire to keep the existing deck at <br />its current setback location; however, it was not legally constructed and should not be continued, <br />replaced or restored. The rear yard has ample space to construct the proposed deck. Staff also <br />appreciates that the neighbor is not opposed to the proposed setback; unfortunately, neighbor <br />approval is not a criteria of approving a variance. <br />CRITERIA AND FINDINGS OF FACT <br />No variance shall be granted unless it meets all the criteria in paragraphs 1. through 7. below. <br />The City shall make findings regarding compliance with these criteria. <br />1. The variance shall be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. <br />The general purpose and intent of the R-X, Rural Executive District is to provide areas for high <br />value, rural residences. <br />The general purpose and intent of the General Provisions section of the zoning ordinance is to <br />assure compatibility of uses' to prevent urban blight, deterioration and decay; and to enhance <br />the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the community. <br />The side yard variance request for a deck is not in harmony with the general purposes and intent <br />of the ordinances. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.