My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/14/2020 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2020
>
10/14/2020 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2021 3:15:01 PM
Creation date
10/9/2020 12:02:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
10/14/2020
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21. Our Variance Narrative: 842 Lois Lane <br />My wife Maggie & I purchased the property in the summer of <br />1991. The 15t owner built it in 1987. The 15t owner added 2 decks to the <br />house, without pulling permits it appears, between 1987 & 1991. Both <br />decks were present when we bought the house as 2►,d owners in 1991. <br />The East deck (the one in question) was originally about 9' off the <br />house, putting it about one foot off the property line towards the north <br />side of the house. The property line moves away from the house as it <br />moves South, towards the back of the property, as the house appears <br />to have been built slightly off parallel to the property line. <br />In addition, our neighbors house to the East, and our house are <br />the two closest to each other houses on our street. Both said to have <br />been built by the same builder, 1 year apart. I believe the neighbors <br />house is closer to the property line than we are. Fwiw. <br />Our current neighbor is fine with our existing deck dimensions <br />and has never objected. Our previous 2 neighbors never objected. <br />The current deck in question has existed since the late 801s with <br />no issues or objections &has been used in a reasonable manner. <br />Our ask® <br />We seek a variance basically to allow us to reasonably keep what <br />we currently have &have had. Which is less than what we started with <br />in 1991 but does not comply with the 5' normal variance. We are asking <br />for 2 % feet. <br />The practical difficulty of anything less than current renders the <br />deck much less useful than what we have known &enjoyed, to date. <br />Respectfully submitted; Brian &Maggie Rydlund <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.