09/09/2020 P&Z Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board September 9, 2020 Page 6 APPROVED MINUTES Mr. Evenson agreed with Mr. Laden stating the exposed fasteners are color matched, not easily visible and overall, the product is of good quality. He specified there are a number of buildings on Lake Drive with exposed fastener roofing. He explained, since the big box stores are making this product more readily available to customers and likely requests for variances will continue, consideration should be given to changing the ordinance. Mr. Root commented he was not concerned with the aesthetics of exposed fasteners. His apprehension was regarding the fact none of the criteria for the variance had been met. He suggested approving the variance with the stipulation the ordinance be revised to allow for color-matched fasteners. Mr. Reinert said there is good argument for the product in regards to its durability. However, he explained the requirements for granting a variance have not been met in this instance and because of this, he would have to vote no to deny approval of the variance. He recommended postponing a decision on the variance and having a special session to discuss the ordinance. He clarified if the ordinance is changed, then the board can allow Ms. Thayer’s roofing material and a variance would not be needed. Mr. Vojtech stated the cost difference between exposed fasteners and non-exposed fasteners is minimal, close to 20 percent. He expressed concern with not being consistent by allowing a few individuals to install metal roofing while not permitting others. He suggested the board review the ordinance instead of granting the variance. Mr. Evenson was also concerned about being inconsistent if the variance is allowed for others, but not for the applicant. He concurred it would be best to proceed and change the ordinance, thereby eliminating the need of a variance. Chair Tralle appreciated Mr. Laden’s comment to consider changing the ordinance. He recommended changing the ordinance and stipulating the fasteners be color coordinated. He commented, considering the financial impact COVID-19 has had on many families, 20 percent can be costly. Moreover, he remarked he struggled to expect Ms. Thayer to not be able to utilize the roofing materials she spent $2,000 on. He concluded he would vote to recommend approval of the variance. Ms. Larsen explained she was hoping the board would vote on the variance so it could then be discussed at the City Council meeting on Monday night. Then, if the variance is approved by the City Council, Ms. Thayer would be able to replace her roof before winter arrives. Ms. Larsen proposed, after City Council’s decision has been made regarding the variance, the Planning and Zoning Board could then begin amending the ordinance.