Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Randall Schumacher <br />February 29, 1988 <br />Page 6 <br />contains a procedure for reassessment its purpose is to <br />correct improper assessments not to reverse <br />jurisdictional defects. A partial list of grounds for <br />challenge to the assessments made for projects <br />following the charter process is as follows: <br />1 Petitions signed by persons owning property <br />not benefitted. Errors in computing required <br />percentages of petitioners. <br />2. Defects in the Council resolution as to scope <br />of the improvement. <br />3. Inadequate information in the published and <br />mailed notice of improvement. <br />4. Modification of the size of the improvement <br />from that described in the notice. <br />5. Improper assessment formula used in resolu- <br />tion. <br />6. An election not held where required by <br />Chapter 8. <br />7. Inadequate public record not showing neces- <br />sary evidence on which Council based its <br />action. <br />8. Rebidding on a scaled down project. <br />9. Acting on the "same" project within one year <br />of public hearing. <br />I'll try to answer questions about and elaborate on <br />these comments Thursday evening. <br />s very truly, <br />David J. Kennedy <br />DJK:caw <br />cc: William Hawkins <br />