My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-05-2020 Park Board Minutes
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Minutes
>
2020 Minutes
>
08-05-2020 Park Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2021 12:54:11 PM
Creation date
12/15/2020 10:10:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved October 2, 2020 <br />developed. The Saddle Club -First Addition was platted in 2014. During the planning <br />phase, it was determined that a public trail connection the two developments was not <br />warranted. The 2030 Comprehensive Plan does not indicate a trail in this specific <br />location. <br />Staff has identified three options related to the strip of park land: <br />• Retain the Property as Designated "Park" <br />• Construct a Public Trail <br />• Vacate the Property <br />Patrick Huelman, Park Board Chair, stated that this property wasn't in the comprehensive <br />trail or park system plan. He stated that a trail could maybe make sense on this <br />property, however there are currently no funds for it. Andrew Levi and Clark Gooder, <br />Park Board members agreed with Huelman. <br />Lino Lakes resident Ms. Sherri Le, 974 Aspen Lane, stated that she supported splitting <br />the 15 feet park property between the property owners. <br />Max Norton, resident whose property is next to the city property, supports the City <br />vacating of the property. <br />Clark Gooder inquired from the two residents who would gain the land if the city were to <br />vacate it, how they currently use it. Norton stated that he uses it as access to his back yard <br />and that there is a shade garden back there from previous owners. <br />Jess Roering, the other land owner that would gain property if the City vacated the land, <br />had concerns regarding the City vacating the land. He is concerned about a fence going <br />up, like a privacy fence, that would make it hard to mow/maintain his lawn as well as <br />access it. He continued that when they built their house they had planned on a trail going <br />in where the strip of land is that is currently being talked about. Because of this they had <br />built a retaining wall. He also stated again that he does not want a privacy fence to show <br />up on that land/space. <br />Andrew Levi, Park Board Vice Chair, stated that there are two options at hand. The <br />options are that the City vacate the property and give it to the land owners or build a <br />trail. He stated that if the Park Board made the recommendation to the City Council to <br />vacate the land, it would be up to residents to hash out the fence. <br />Roering inquired as to why this sudden change? It has been this way for 25 years <br />(referring to the City owning the property and the residents using it the way they have <br />been). Huelman responded by stating that it's a liability to the City to keep it as is. <br />Gooder inquired if anyone uses the property as a trail. Residents responded "no" and that <br />it is just used to access their backyards. <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.