Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br /> APPROVED <br /> 134 so they can make the settings as they chose and wouldn ' t need to remove the equipment <br /> 135 for a change in preferences . <br /> 136 <br /> 137 Councilmember Ruhland asked how long the City of Hugo has had the program and Mr. <br /> 138 Nelson said it' s been two years (they' ve sold approximately 100 units and have 150 left) . <br /> 139 Councilmember Ruhland also asked what' s to stop a person from buying the units at this <br /> 140 discount and selling them for a profit; Mr. Nelson said the program allows for the City to <br /> 141 check and ensure equipment is being used. <br /> 142 <br /> 143 Councilmember Stoesz expressed concern that the City may be competing with private <br /> 144 retailers who would be selling this equipment. <br /> 145 <br /> 146 Councilmember Lyden remarked that he has questions about the program . He sees it <br /> 147 differently than as used for City property . <br /> 148 <br /> 149 City Administrator Cotton remarked that, from a utility billing perspective, she has seen <br /> 15o bills that indicate people have programs that run the same amount of water year after <br /> 151 year, never taking into consideration the type of control offered by this program <br /> 152 equipment that would save water and costs . <br /> 153 <br /> 154 Mr. Nelson noted that the number one water usage in the city is irrigation and <br /> 155 communicating to the residents on the matter can be very effective . This program would <br /> 156 be an additional tool . He noted that if every household in the City were hooked up, the <br /> 157 water savings could be 20 percent across the board . Although technology changes , this <br /> 158 is the best equipment available now . <br /> 159 <br /> 160 Councilmember Cavegn said he ' s in support of the program and he ' s aware that the <br /> 161 technology has been around for a while and is tested . He likes the long term benefits . <br /> 162 <br /> 163 Councilmember Ruhland said he agrees with much of what Councilmember Cavegn has <br /> 164 said; he is in favor of the program . <br /> 165 <br /> 166 Councilmember Stoesz remarked that infrastructure requires internet connection and that <br /> 167 could be an issue for some people . He is opposed to the program ; he will probably be <br /> 168 purchasing a system on his own and thinks that communication is the best way to handle <br /> 169 conservation . <br /> 170 <br /> 171 Mayor Rafferty remarked that he understands remarks heard on both sides of the matter. <br /> 172 But he knows that water conservation is an important issue to the City. If this starts to <br /> 173 spread the word, all the better. There is subsidy of the City involved so there will be <br /> 174 scrutiny but you still have to solve problems . <br /> 175 <br /> 176 Councilmember Lyden asked if the City could provide the equipment paid through utility <br /> 177 billing. <br /> 178 <br /> 4 <br />