My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/10/2021 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2021
>
03/10/2021 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2021 10:59:28 AM
Creation date
3/9/2021 8:19:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
03/10/2021
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />department, board or commission of the jurisdiction or of the state can appeal. <br />The statute also gives the right to appeal to “any aggrieved person.” <br /> <br />f. The process for initiating a case in district court for review of a decision on a <br />variance has been argued over for some time. In a county case, it was <br />definitively decided in 2013 that even though the statute identifies the judicial <br />review as an ‘appeal” that you initiate the case just as any other against a County: <br />by personally serving the Chair of the County Board of Commissioners or the <br />County Auditor. See In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd., 835 N.W. 2d <br />472 (Minn. 2013). For a city, that would mean serving the chief executive <br />officer or the clerk. <br /> <br />B. Conditional Use Permits. <br /> <br />1. Conditional Use Permits in General. <br /> <br />a. Conditional use permits (CUP’s) give a municipality flexibility and discretion <br />designed to meet the problem which arises where certain uses, although generally <br />compatible with the basic use classification of a particular zone, should not be <br />permitted to be located anywhere as a matter of right. <br /> <br />b. Conditional use designations are appropriate in situations where specific uses, <br />while considered essentially desirable to the community, should not be <br />absolutely authorized without consideration of such issues as current and <br />anticipated traffic congestion, pollution issues, smell, population density, noise, <br />effect on adjoining land values, or any other considerations involving public <br />health, safety or general welfare. <br /> <br />c. Contrast this with permitted uses which are absolutely allowed in a district. <br /> <br />2. A Zoning Ordinance Must Contain the Standards to Consider in Granting or <br />Denying a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />a. When a district court reviews a conditional use permit decision, the court will <br />refer directly to the standards and criteria in the ordinance in reviewing the <br />decision. <br /> <br />b. Minn. Stat. § 462.3595 states that the applicant bears the burden of proof to show <br />an entitlement to a CUP by showing “the standards and criteria stated in the <br />ordinance will be satisfied.” <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.