Laserfiche WebLink
34 <br />whether the evidence could reasonably support or justify the determination. In Re <br />Appeal of Brine, 460 N.W.2d 53 (Minn. 1990). <br /> <br />B. What Court Conducts Review <br /> <br />1. A person aggrieved by a decision on a variance seeks judicial review by petitioning <br />the district court for review within 30 days of receipt of notice of the decision. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.361. <br />2. Challenges to city conditional use or interim permit decisions are resolved in district <br />court. Minn. Stat. § 462.361. <br />a. When a county zoning ordinance directs that judicial review of a conditional use <br />permit is to be by the district court that can supersede and replace the general <br />rule discussed above. <br />3. Any taxpayer in the City may institute mandamus proceedings in district court to <br />compel specific performance by the proper official of a duty required to be done <br />under Chapter 462. Specific rules and principles apply to when such actions can be <br />maintained. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />RASW: 117914