My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-22-2021 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
Searchable Packets
>
03-22-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2021 12:50:47 PM
Creation date
3/23/2021 3:25:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
03/22/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />DRAFT <br /> 5 <br /> 178 <br />Councilmember Cavegn said he supports the discussion but he feels a communications 179 <br />position focusing on the website and social networking would be a better approach to 180 <br />improving the process of providing information to the public. 181 <br /> 182 <br />Mayor Rafferty said is supportive of continuing the conversation and he supports a 183 <br />strategic planning session to discuss larger policies, including on communication. In the 184 <br />meantime, he suggests looking at what other cities as doing. Councilmember Stoesz 185 <br />remarked that looking at what other cities are doing on line is should be a part of that 186 <br />process. 187 <br /> 188 <br />6. Review Recommended 2021 Park and Trails Fund Projects – Public Services 189 <br />Director DeGardner explained that he is reporting back after the council’s discussion at 190 <br />the last work session. The Park Board had presented their recommendations at that time. 191 <br /> 192 <br />Renovating Lino Park – Preliminary plans for a play structure were shown, including 193 <br />visions of a custom plan for park equipment; the council also viewed possibilities for 194 <br />ornamentation (gables), aesthetics, etc. for a park structure. 195 <br /> 196 <br />Councilmember Stoesz remarked that he is a big supporter of stone and steel because they 197 <br />last. 198 <br /> 199 <br />Mayor Rafferty suggested that the key is to decide what to put in and ensure it is 200 <br />something that will stand the test of time. He’s interested in nice structures. He sees 201 <br />that Lino Park is heavily used. 202 <br /> 203 <br />Councilmember Lyden asked what the slide structure would be made from and Mr. 204 <br />DeGardner said it is steel. Further clarifications: engineered wood fiber is the base; all 205 <br />handicap accessible. A councilmember asked why a building/structure is needed. 206 <br />Mayor Rafferty said it provides shelter in a large park, a picnic area (shade) for 207 <br />gatherings. Councilmember Lyden said he sees water for public consumption as a 208 <br />necessity. Director DeGardner noted that there would be an irrigation shed and they 209 <br />could have a spigot from there; the idea of a water fountain is less popular in park 210 <br />facilities these days. 211 <br /> 212 <br />The council is interested in continuing to give information to staff on ideas. 213 <br /> 214 <br />Public Services Director DeGardner asked if the council is okay with the playground set 215 <br />up, work can begin on that; discussion could continue on the structure. There is timing 216 <br />involved in ordering playground equipment. 217 <br /> 218 <br />Councilmember Lyden noted the plastic slide; what is the expectation on how long that 219 <br />would last. Mr. DeGardner said poly is the standard for the slides and he feels the Little 220 <br />Tykes system has proven to wear well. 221 <br /> 222
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.