Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />APPROVED <br />37 G) Consider Resolution No. 21-18, Approving ACRED Cost Share <br />38 Agreement <br />39 H) Consider Approval of Springbrook Human Resources Module, <br />40 Meg Sawyer <br />41 FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />42 There was no report from the Finance Department, <br />43 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />44 There was no report from the Administration Department. <br />45 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />46 There was no report from the Public Safety Department. <br />Approved <br />Approved <br />47 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />48 5A) Consider Resolution No. 2146, Order Project, Approve Plans and Specifications, and <br />49 Authorize Ad For Bids, Hard Court Facility at Birch Street and Centerville Road — Public <br />50 Services Director DeGardner reviewed his written report requesting approval to move forward with <br />51 the planning and bidding process for the Hard Court Facility project. He reviewed the proposed <br />52 budget for the project and how it would be funded. Bids would be opened on April 7 under the <br />53 current schedule. <br />54 Councilmember Lyden remarked that just because Tower Park is on the agenda does not make it a <br />55 priority. This would be a seasonal park (two tennis courts and four pickleballs courts) and that is <br />56 different from the YMCA facility and discussion on the YMCA facility is his priority. Opening the <br />57 YMCA will take a financial commitment. Opening the former YMCA facility would provide <br />58 services reaching far more people and for twelve months of the year. Historically this facility was <br />59 voted down by the public. There are ten neighborhood parks that need funding. He believes that <br />60 this project should therefore be tabled until the YMCA facility discussion has occurred. <br />61 Councilmember Cavegn remarked that he would echo Councilmember Lyden's thoughts. He added <br />62 that beyond the YMCA discussion there are other City parks in need of updating. And in his view <br />63 the location of this proposed facility wouldn't serve Lino residents as well. He thinks that funding <br />64 could be better invested than in a new park. <br />65 Mayor Rafferty noted that the status of the economy and valuations caused some delay in updating <br />66 park facilities. Back in 2015, the council made a decision to put funding away (park dedication) for <br />67 this area of the City. On that side of the City there are many homes in the vicinity of this proposed <br />68 park and further there are very limited tennis and pickleball facilities in the City. While he doesn't <br />69 take comments about the larger discussion lightly, he favors getting something done in this area of <br />7o the City. He noted that the former YMCA facility discussion is important but this is a different <br />71 facility discussion in his mind. He is in favor of this action because it is simply to go out and get <br />72 bids to see what the cost would be. <br />73 Councilmember Stoesz said he would echo the Mayor's comments and add that park dedication <br />74 funds should be utilized in the area from which they are received. He believes thereneed for a <br />75 park in that area of the city. <br />2 <br />