My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2021-021 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2021
>
2021-021 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2021 3:08:00 PM
Creation date
4/13/2021 3:08:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
04/12/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
21-21
Resolution Title
Resolution Approving Development Agreement And Planned Unit Development Agreement for Watermark 4th Addition
Resolution Date Passed
04/12/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> RESOLUTION NO.21-21 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND <br /> PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT <br /> FOR WATERMARK 4th ADDITION <br /> - approving <br /> WHEREAS,on April 12, 2021 the City Council passed Resolution No. 21 20 <br /> Watermark 4th Addition PUD Final Plan/Final Plat; and <br /> WHEREAS,the City's subdivision ordinance and conditions of approval require the execution <br /> of a development agreement between the Developer and the City of Lino Lakes. <br /> NOW,THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes <br /> hereby approves the Development Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement <br /> between US Home Corporation and the City of Lino Lakes for Watermark 4th Addition and <br /> authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute such agreement on behalf of the City. <br /> Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 12th day of April, 2021. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember <br /> Stoez and was duly seconded by Councilmember Ruhland and upon vote being taken thereon, <br /> the following voted in favor thereof: Stoesz, Ruhland, Cavegn,Lyden, Rafferty <br /> The following voted against same: None <br /> S /L.' �i.l`f' ,. r <br /> Ro Rafferty, ayor <br /> ATTEST: <br /> Ju is e Bartell C Clr'k <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.