Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />APPROVED <br />1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />2 MINUTES <br />3 <br />4 DATE April 5, 2021 <br />5 TIME STARTED 6:00 p.m. <br />6 TIME ENDED 6:35 p.m. <br />7 MEMBERS PRESENT Council Member Stoesz (by phone), <br />8 Lyden, Ruhland, Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty <br />9 MEMBERS ABSENT None <br />to Staff members present: City Administrator Sarah Cotton; Finance Director Hannah <br />11 Lynch; Human Resources Coordinator Meg Sawyer; Director of Public Services Rick <br />12 DeGardner; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br />13 <br />14 1. CIP Software —Finance Director Lynch reported that she is revisiting the <br />15 information provided to the council earlier on new software. This would help the City <br />16 facilitate and track as well as build a robust reporting system on the capital program. She <br />17 is reporting back on questions that were posed at the last council review. The suggestion <br />18 of utilizing Microsoft Project or a free web -based software was investigated and it was <br />19 found to be not appropriate for the City's use. In checking with other cities, she found <br />20 most utilizing Plan4t and in investigating that software, she suggests that it wouldn't be <br />21 as good a fit as Easy CIP. She noted page views in the staff report comparing the two <br />22 programs. She has also provided cost comparisons. Staff is recommending that the City <br />23 move forward with Easy CIP. <br />24 <br />25 Mayor Rafferty remarked that the comparison view is helpful. He added that the Easy <br />26 CIP product is quite new and wonders if there is any city experience with the program. <br />27 Ms. Lynch noted one city that utilizes it and another that is considering it. The mayor <br />28 remarked favorably on the type of information that the City could get from the program. <br />29 <br />3o Councilmember Cavegn asked about the quality of technical support; Ms. Lynch <br />31 remarked that she has worked with Easy CIP in the trial program and found the support to <br />32 be very good. <br />33 <br />34 Councilmember Ruhland asked if Easy CIP will provide information on their clients and <br />35 Ms. Lynch noted that they are new, are based in California and that could be why they are <br />36 less seen; Plan4t has been utilized for years by some cities and it is pretty much what was <br />37 available for some time. <br />38 <br />39 Administrator Cotton noted that she received information through the finance officers' <br />4o group; there is high interest among cities seeking services outside of Plan4t (which has <br />41 been utilized for quite some time and is an older technology). <br />42 <br />43 Councilmember Lyden said he supports staff s recommendation because they will be the <br />44 ones utilizing the program. <br />1 <br />