10-09-1997 Charter Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Charter Commission October 9, 1997 Page 2 the storm sewer improvements are based upon actual construction costs divided by the total number of lots (183). Mr. Ahrens further explained that one neighborhood meeting was held, at which 30 to 40 people appeared. Mr. Ahrens reviewed the details of the proposed project at that time, and felt that attendants understood the process. Following City Council acceptance of this report, a public hearing was scheduled for July 28, 1997. After SEH's presentation audience participation was encouraged, beginning with a positive statement. The public hearing was closed on that date, beginning the 60-day waiting period within which affected residents have the opportunity to give additional input in the form of a petition, either for or against the project. The petitioning period ended September 27, 1997, with no petitions filed. Mr. Ahrens stated that at this time the City is "on track" for consideration of this item on the upcoming election ballot. City Attorney Hawkins prepared the following question for the November 4, 1997 election ballot: QUESTION NO. 2 The City Council of Lino Lakes is considering the improvement and reconstruction of certain streets within the City. The total cost is estimated to be $1,969,110.00. Twenty eight percent(28%) of these costs are proposed to be paid by levying special assessments against the benefited properties within the subdivision, in accordance with standard City assessment policies. The remaining seventy two percent (72%) is proposed to be paid by money within the City General Fund which will include property tax revenues generated from the entire City. The City Charter requires voter approval before using General Fund revenues for this purpose. "Shall the City Council of Lino Lakes be authorized to pay for a portion of the costs of local street im- provement from the General Fund of the City?" Yes No Mr. Ahrens indicated that Mr. Elsenpeter of the Press contacted Mr. Ahrens, stating that he would be taking most of the information for his upcoming article from the public hearing minutes and the feasibility report. Following the election on November 4, the City Council will be in a position to take action on this matter based upon the outcome of the vote. Chair Montain asked if those in attendance at the public hearing had a clear understanding of the Charter and how it works. Mr. Ahrens indicated that the majority seemed to accept the explanations offered by Staff, however, some felt the reconstruction process seemed difficult, and a small percentage came forward with negative comments.