My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-09-1998 Charter Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Minutes
>
1998 Minutes
>
04-09-1998 Charter Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:35:20 PM
Creation date
4/30/2021 10:52:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Meeting Date
04/09/1998
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br /> April 9, 1998 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Commissioner Sullivan agreed that it was a good idea to create a simple form, but the <br /> Commission did not want to give people the idea to petition everything. He added that there are <br /> many ways to address an issue with the City Council before a petition is necessary. <br /> Commissioner Sullivan then referred to Chapter 5, summarizing the use of petitions from the <br /> Charter. <br /> Commissioner Bening stated that he did not believe it was the function of the Commission to <br /> create the form, their function is to maintain the Charter. He agreed with Commissioner <br /> DeMotts that they did not want to deal with a large number of petitions. He believed that <br /> citizens would have more dedication to their cause if petitions were a bit difficult. <br /> Commissioner Turner explained that making it user friendly was a tool for marketing. She <br /> believed that creating a form would not make petitions easy. She suggested they preface the <br /> form with the steps required, with the last option being a referendum and petition. <br /> Commissioner Sullivan indicated they did not want to spell out the steps for a citizen to get to the <br /> City Council, stating that efficiency is a problem. He would like to get more information from <br /> the members who had previously obtained a petition. <br /> Commissioner Zastro noted that if things were going smoothly the forms would not be used. <br /> Commissioner Dunn stated that the Charter is very clear on the process of Referendum and <br /> Petition, indicating it was not up to the Commission to create a form but they should inform the <br /> City Council and Staff how difficult it is to obtain a petition. <br /> Commissioner Aldentaler explained that the roadblocks to his petition was the City, not the <br /> Charter. He believed the Charter was very clear. His petition got stronger as the City got harder <br /> to deal with. <br /> Commissioner Sullivan asked what the roadblocks were in the format, that is addressed in the <br /> Charter. <br /> Commissioner Aldentaler again indicated that the struggle was with the City, but they did make it <br /> work. The City determined that some of their signatures were not acceptable and they had to <br /> work within a stricter timeline. <br /> Commissioner Sullivan stated if that happened again to contact the Chair of the Charter <br /> Commission, as they would have had a meeting and possibly been able to help. <br /> Chair Montain indicated they were perceiving this to be harder than it should have been which is <br /> why they should create a form, handout, and instruction booklet. <br /> Commissioner Dunn indicated they should determine where the real problem is. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.