My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/12/2021 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2021
>
05/12/2021 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2021 10:02:59 AM
Creation date
5/7/2021 10:00:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Minutes
Meeting Date
05/12/2021
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br />b. The Comprehensive Plan also requires the City to consider where there should be <br />an established limit for how much flexibility will be granted, such as lot <br />width/depth, street, width, setbacks, etc. Each PUD starts with the underlying <br />zoning district standards and the City (staff, Planning and Zoning Board and City <br />Council) must weigh the flexibility requested by the developer in exchange for <br />PUD benefits that would not otherwise be possible under standard zoning. Staff <br />believes that the PUD process has worked and changes are not necessary. <br /> <br />c. The Board should consider whether the Rural PUD should continue to be PUD <br />(under the recommended zoning process) or as a permitted option. The Rural <br />PUD is a cluster ordinance that could simply be allowed in the rural residential <br />zoning districts with a plat, subject to the clustering and open space standards that <br />currently exist. Those standards allow 4 units per 40 acres (up to 8 per 40 with an <br />MPCA approved shared septic) with a one acre minimum lot size and requires <br />that 50% of the land area be preserved. Those same performance standards could <br />be retained, but simply allow the subdivision with approval of a preliminary and <br />final plat if the standards are approved. That could incentivize more developers to <br />use the tool, which would preserve more open space, if it is allowed by right. <br /> <br />d. Are there different standards that should be considered to ensure that the City gets <br />the type of development desired? <br /> <br />e. Should the PUD offer more incentives for developers, such as density bonuses to <br />provide affordable housing or meet other City goals? <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Staff believes the PUD is a good tool for both the City and the developer as it allows mixed use <br />developments like the town center “Legacy at Woods Edge” and provides for development <br />options that may not fit within current district standards. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has <br />several mixed use areas planned that will likely be developed as PUDs in order to provide the <br />mix of uses envisioned. The PUD standards as written establish additional performance <br />standards beyond the standard zoning requirements, primarily open space/greenway <br />preservation. The PUD zoning district gives the City more flexibility to negotiate the PUD <br />standards than the current CUP process. <br /> <br />The Planning & Zoning Board should review the existing PUD standards, the changes <br />recommended by staff and provide direction on any other desired changes. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />Provide direction to staff on Planned Unit Development ordinance revisions. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.