Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 <br /> Park Board <br /> August 20, 1979 <br /> Board would be better off taking money. In the past, the Park Board has not chosen <br /> the pieces of land, although it had turned some down; However, Mr. Shaughnessy brought <br /> up one instance where a block of lots had been taken for a park. Mr. Crouse felt the <br /> Park Board should be more cautious about taking money in lieu of land in the future <br /> because the valuation was so much less than the land was worth. Mr. Zelinka thought <br /> there were no legal problems with Mr. Scherer's proposal , although it was not gener- <br /> ally done. Marilyn will check with .Mr. Locher on this. As far as selection of dedi- <br /> cated land, Mr. Zelinka felt the developer may want first right of refusal--if the <br /> lot is sold, the developer would get the first chance to give a high bid. This will <br /> be discussed further at the next meeting. Mr. Zelinka has asked Mr. Locher in refer- <br /> ence to the land valuation to get a resolution worded so that only the right numbers <br /> need to be put in. Mr. Scherer asked about the possiblities of the Park Board as a <br /> separate entity elected by the people, so that it could make its own decisions , <br /> finalized without the process of going through both the P & Z and Council . Mr. Zelinka <br /> said that special state legislation would be required to do that, but it could be <br /> done; and that the Council was the only body that could authorize funds under the <br /> present system, and also under the City Administrator system, although not under the <br /> City Manager system. He discussed the plans to hire a City Administrator, and the <br /> effect this would have on the Park Board in the future. The question of whether <br /> capital outlay should all come out of dedicated funds or whether the City could help <br /> out on that was raised. Mr. Zelinka indicated that it could come out of general <br /> funds or a levy for park purposes. There was no park levy now, but the last time <br /> there had been it was a half mil . <br /> A letter had been received from Metropolitan Parks and Open Spaces on the LAWCON grant <br /> in reference to a meeting to be held September 4. It was felt that it would increase <br /> the chances of getting the grant if it was attended. A team of Don Volk, Ina Liljedahl , <br /> Larry Crouse, Mr. Zelinka and perhaps Marilyn Anderson was suggested. Mr. Crouse <br /> suggested meeting over dinner beforehand to discuss the situation and to prepare the <br /> presentation. Applicants would be scheduled on the agenda on a first-come-first-serve <br /> basis , and on the 17th applicants would be reviewed and recommendations made to Metro <br /> Council . Mr. Crouse moved that the Park Board reserve a space at the meeting. Ina <br /> Liljedahl will call to do this. Mr. Scherer seconded the motion. All were in favor. <br /> Motion declared passed. <br /> Don Volk, arriving at 8:45, reviewed the preliminary budget he had prepared. In refer- <br /> ence to the hockey rink, he had no prices back on this yet, and the $6,000 was an esti- <br /> mate only. He indicated the Park Board would get almost total cooperation from the <br /> Hockey Association on labor, with the exception of things like grading, so that the <br /> $6,000 represented the cost for materials only. He had looked into the lighting, and <br /> three more fixtures of a mercury vapor type would be adequate. It was felt that the <br /> hockey rink should be taken off the 1980 budget, and included in the 1979 budget. <br /> Don Volk felt an alternative to hiring a full-time man would be two permanent part- <br /> time people, although there were pros and cons for each. The hours put in by the <br /> present man averaged 22 hours per week year round, but this represented about three <br /> months of the year, March, April , and May, with virtually no hours, and 40-hour weeks <br /> during the summer. He indicated that the $500 under capital outlay for landscape <br /> and ballfield grader included a piece of machinery. Mr. Zelinka noted that 10 percent <br /> of dedicated funds are used for maintenance and operation, and that 90 percent had to <br /> be used for capital outlay; if more is needed for operating funds , a levy is raised. <br />