My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/09/2021 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2021
>
06/09/2021 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 11:39:29 AM
Creation date
6/4/2021 3:08:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
06/09/2021
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> May 12,2021 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Mr. Reinert commented that he wants to make sure the language we use does not <br /> create a loophole for developers. <br /> Chair Tralle asked the board if there is a consensus regarding creating a minimum <br /> standard lot size. <br /> Mr. Wipperf firth stated that he thinks the City should continue to use the underlying <br /> zoning district standards. He commented that it seems like it has been working and <br /> sets a good guideline right from the start. <br /> Mr. Reinert commented that he was not in favor of creating a minimum standard lot <br /> size. <br /> Mr. Laden concurred with not having a minimum standard within the PUD. <br /> Chair Tralle stated that he is in favor of not changing the lot sizes as it allows the City <br /> more flexibility. <br /> Mr. Vojtech commented that he is in favor of having standards but we already have a <br /> minimum with the underlying zoning standards. <br /> Mr. Grochala asked the board if they have any opinions on rural cluster zoning. The <br /> City would like to pull it out of the PUD and make it a permitted option in the rural <br /> districts. V <br /> Mr. Reinert asked Mr. Grochala to define cluster zoning. <br /> Mr. Grochala explained that the Rural PUD is a cluster ordinance that could simply <br /> be allowed subject to the clustering and open space standards that currently exist. <br /> Those standards allow 4 units per 40 acres (up to 8 per 40 with an MPCA approved <br /> shared septic)with a one-acre minimum lot size and requires that 50% of the land <br /> area be preserved. <br /> Mr. Reinert stated that he is in favor of allowing the Rural PUD to be a permitted <br /> option. <br /> Mr. Laden stated that if the goal is to get everyone on a community septic system he <br /> is in favor of this. <br /> Chair Tralle concurred. <br /> Mr. Root commented that he is in favor of this. He stated that the main benefits of <br /> cluster developments are the collocating of properties and to more efficiently develop <br /> and preserve open space. <br /> DRAFT MINUTES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.