Laserfiche WebLink
Planning & Zoning Board <br />May 12, 2021 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />APPROVED MINUTES <br />several opportunities to provide feedback on the ordinance updates at different points <br />in the process. The work plan includes seven P&Z Board meetings and three Council <br />work sessions leading up to Council adoption in April 2022. The discussion of the <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) standard is the first step in the Zoning Ordinance <br />update. <br /> <br />Board Comments <br /> <br />Mr. Reinert agreed that PUD’s work well in Lino Lakes. He stated too much <br />flexibility in PUD’s can result in developments that don’t resemble the vision for the <br />City. He stated he is in favor of some minimum requirements that won’t turn an 80- <br />foot lot into a 45-foot lot. <br /> <br />Mr. Root stated that the way it is currently written it is essentially a negotiated zoning <br />designation. He stated that he thinks this is to loose. He would like to implement a <br />more direct connection between the underlying zone and what is allowed for <br />negotiation in a PUD. He argued for having the underlying zone in addition to a PUD <br />zoning overlay. This creates a better connection between the two. Mr. Root noted <br />that he thought cluster zoning in rural areas is a good idea that can lead to more <br />continuous open space. He suggested that there be some specific standards for that as <br />well. Mr. Root also stated that it should become a requirement that the property <br />owner/applicant hold a neighborhood meeting for informal comment and feedback. <br /> <br />Mr. Reinert asked Mr. Root for a specific example of what a PUD overlay would look <br />like. <br /> <br />Mr. Root explained that he is most familiar with specific lot widths and areas. The <br />overlay district would be more specific to each individual property. <br /> <br />Mr. Reinert commented that previously it had been discussed that lot sizes be set at a <br />certain size and disregard the shape of the lot in order to allow flexibility while <br />maintaining integrity. <br /> <br />Ms. Larsen stated that Marketplace is an example of an existing PDO. <br /> <br />Mr. Laden commented that he agreed with Mr. Root that the overlay district is a good <br />direction to explore. He also concurred that the City should require the property <br />owner/ applicant to a hold neighborhood meeting before submitting a formal concept <br />application. He asked staff if there are any examples where a PUD was done as a <br />CUP. He stated that he wants to make sure that we are not eliminating something that <br />has been useful. Additionally, he commented that he wants to make sure that the <br />open space we are preserving is useable land and not unbuildable just so the <br />developer can get smaller lots. <br />