My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/07/1994 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1994 Park Board Packets
>
02/07/1994 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:14:12 PM
Creation date
6/11/2021 9:11:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/07/1994
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of Sites for Park, Recreation, and Forestry Department <br /> South Athletic Complex City of Lino Lakes <br /> Evaluation Sheet for Parcel "A" <br /> Location: Birch Street and Centerville Rd. Zoning Status:Rural <br /> Parcel Size: Approximately 78 acres MUSA Line Status:Outside Current Metropolitan Urban Services Area <br /> Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Statements <br /> Location The site is bounded on the west by Centerville Road and on the north by Birch Street.It lies <br /> "is the site centrally located with respect to furthest to the east of the sites being considered.It is also the furthest from the population <br /> user populations and other park system center(in the south half of the city). <br /> components?" <br /> Site Size, Shape,and Orientation The site is approximately 78 acres in size,of which about 10.5 acres are classified as <br /> "Are these conducive to the type of facilities wetlands.Another two acres fall within a public utility easement.Although the site is linear,its <br /> programmed for this site?" shape,size,and orientation are suitable for this type of use. Although the location of the <br /> wetlands do pose some constraints on facility design and layout,it is not perceived to be a <br /> major concern. <br /> jIZpography With the exception of a moderate ravine between the wetlands on the north end of the site, <br /> lil slopes and drainage patterns inhibit existing grades and topographical changes should not pose much of a constraint on <br /> -evelopment?" development. The mildly rolling character of the north and south ends of the site should allow <br /> for facility layout as well as proper drainage. <br /> Soils Most of the higher,non-wetland areas have foamy, loamy fine sand,and fine sand soils. <br /> "Are subsoils and topsoils suitable for this Although topsoil is limited,the subsoils are acceptable for this type of development. <br /> type of development?Will the watertable <br /> interfere with development?" <br /> Vegetation/Wetiands As stated,about 10.5 acres are classified as wetlands,which are protected.Although they do <br /> "Will vegetation provide buffering ?Will it pose a development limitation,it is feasible to incorporate them into the design,especially with <br /> conflict with site development?"Will wetlands respect to storm water control and,to some degree,site aesthetics. In addition to the <br /> interfere with site development? wetlands,several acres are covered by trees and other woody vegetation. For the most part, <br /> these areas could be retained to help soften the aesthetics of the site.They should not pose <br /> any significant impact on developmentâalthough it should be expected that some removal will <br /> be necessary to accommodate facility layout. The remainder of the site is either used for <br /> agriculture or lying fallow. <br /> Vehicle Access Vehicular access is very good. Birch Street provides access on the north side of the site. <br /> "Is the site accessible from arterial or Centerville Road provides access on the west side.Since both of these roads parallel the full <br /> collector streets?" length and width of the site, providing entrance drives and parking lots to service the facilities. <br /> should not pose any major site design constraints. <br /> Trail Access Although not extensive,site access via trails is available.The transportation trail currently being <br /> "Is the site accessible from the community developed along Birch Street could be extended to this site. Since this trail interlinks with the <br /> trail system?" community-wide trail system,trail access from most areas within the southern half of the city <br /> would be feasible. However,given that this site lies further away from the population center <br /> than the other sites,some potential trail users may find the distance from their home to the site <br /> to far to walk or ride the bicycle. <br /> Brauer& Associates, Ltd. 2 Project No. 93-35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.