My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/04/1990 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1990 Park Board Packets
>
06/04/1990 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:03:01 PM
Creation date
6/11/2021 1:03:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
06/04/1990
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_3- <br /> A municipality's authority over private property through outright acquisition or <br /> zoning control is considered a normal exercise of its police power based upon <br /> language in MSA, .Chapter 462.358, Subd. 1. : <br /> "Authority. To protect and promote the public health, safety, and <br /> welfare, and to facilitate adequate provision for <br /> transportation, water, sewage, storm drainage, schools, parks, <br /> playgrounds, and other public services and facilities, a <br /> municipality may by ordinance adopt subdivision regulations <br /> establishing standards, requirements, and procedures for the review <br /> and approval or disapproval of subdivisions." <br /> The test of whether it is reasonable to to require such dedication resides in an <br /> understanding that the municipality by approval of a proposed subdivision plat, <br /> which meets alb the typical zoning requirements (e.g. set-backs, easements, <br /> right-of-ways, etc.) enables the developer to profit financially by selling the <br /> subdivision lots as building sites and thus realize a greater price than could <br /> have been obtained if he had sold his property as unplatted lands. In return <br /> for this benefit the municipality may require the developer to dedicate part of <br /> his platted land to meet a demand for park usage which the municipality would <br /> not have encountered except for the influx of people into the community from the <br /> occupancy of such building sites [28 Wis. 2d 619, 137 N.W. 2d 4483 . <br /> The Statute (MSA Chapter 462.358, Subd. 2b) authorizes municipalities to require <br /> for subdivision approval, dedication of a "reasonable portion" of subdivision <br /> property for parks. The language "reasonable portion",. the Court ruled would be <br /> construed as that land portion which a municipality has determined that it will <br /> need to acquire for park and recreation purposes in its Comprehensive Plan (MSA, <br /> Chapter 462.355) resulting from subdivision approval. <br /> Since this landmark decision, many local governments, as well as those listed in <br /> this report have generally followed this decision in the promulgation of park <br /> dedication ordinances . This court decision, the accompanying judicial <br /> interpretation, along with the state statute recognize that there is an <br /> important factor of "value equivalency" in the dedication of either land or cash <br /> for a specific development. In other words, a park dedication ordinance should <br /> "` to the degree possible treat everyone equally irregardless of a land or cash <br /> contribution. ordinance No. 288 was adopted by the Vadnais Heights City Council <br /> in 1982 and requires land or cash dedication for park and recreation purposes <br /> from residential, commercial or industrial development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.