Laserfiche WebLink
RECOMMENDATION TO: CITY COUNCIL OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS - PAGE 6 <br /> FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 1989 <br /> SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE SECTION 510. 09 , SUBD.9 , <br /> PARR DEDICATION <br /> Mr. Larson commented that there -appears to be no dispute with the <br /> changes recommended by the Parks Commission; the question is whether <br /> to include any of the Chamber's recommendations . <br /> MOTION by Tatone, seconded by Sherwood, recommending to City Council <br /> Y approval of Amendments to City Code Section 510 . 09, Subdivision 9, <br /> as recommended by the Parks Commission. <br /> : Mr. Fitch noted that he strongly favors one suggestion_ made- by the <br /> Chamber. He stated that he believes there is the potential for <br /> a justification of park dedication credits in excess of 25% . He <br /> ' _ believes this should be recognized in the ordinance. <br /> Mr. Sherwood agreed. <br /> Mr. Tatone stated that at present there is no evidence to suggest <br /> 10"N that a credit of more than 25% is appropriate. He noted that this <br /> issue could be presented and considered as an additional amendment <br /> to City Code at a later date. <br /> Mr. Schmidt concurred with Mr. Tatone. <br /> Mr. Stiffler expressed a concern regarding collection of park <br /> dedication fees; he commented that it does not seem appropriate to <br /> "favor" large business over small business by requiring fees at time <br /> of plat. <br /> MOTION-CARRIED - (5-3) Nay: Stiffler, Mueller, Fitch <br /> CITY COUNCIL REVIEW DATE - DECEMBER 11 1989 <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS <br /> Ir6uise A. H nz ecord' g Clerk <br /> �'q <br />