Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD December 14, 1988 <br /> to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br /> allowed by the official controls . <br /> 2. That the plight of the landowner is due to <br /> circumstances unique to his property not <br /> created by the land owner. <br /> 3 . That the hardship is not due to economic <br /> considerations along and when a reasonable <br /> use for the property exists under the terms <br /> of the ordinance. <br /> 4. that granting the variance requested will <br /> not confer on the applicant any special <br /> priviledge that would be denied by this <br /> Ordinance to other lands , structures , or <br /> buildings in the same district . <br /> 5 . That the proposed actions will not unreasonably <br /> diminish or impair established property <br /> values within the neighborhood. <br /> 6. That the proposed actions will be in keeping <br /> with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> This property is unique, and could not be put to reasonable <br /> use due to the shortness of the 40 acres . <br /> This motion is contingent upon Ms. Marier filing the <br /> appropriate documents in order to substantiate the request <br /> for a variance. The applicant has agreed to this . <br /> Mr. Prokop seconded the motion, and was approved <br /> unanimously. <br /> ACCESSORY BUILDING AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE: <br /> Ms . Nelson researched the accessory building ordinance of <br /> three cities . <br /> The City of Blaine allows 1200 S. F. of garage space which is <br /> a Combination of attached and detached garages or accessory <br /> structures with a 200 S. F. additional shed or greenhouse. <br /> This pertains to Single Family Zones. <br /> Shoreview is similar, allowing 1500 S. F. in 3 buildings <br /> including the attached garage. <br /> Page 6 <br />