My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/06/1988 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1988 Park Board Packets
>
06/06/1988 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:06:01 PM
Creation date
6/11/2021 3:31:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
06/06/1988
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REPORT OVERVIEW <br /> This chapter summarizes the major <br /> findings of the opinion survey and ser- <br /> ves as an executive summary. <br /> The City of Lino Lakes 1988 Opinion Sur- ° The five most highly desired addi- <br /> vey was mailed to all of Lino Lakes' tions to park facilities and activities <br /> households in April of 1988. Results have were <br /> been tabulated and the following report 1) hiking/walking/jogging trails <br /> presents the attitudes of Lino Lakes resi- 2) bicycling trails <br /> dents. 3) youth recreation programs <br /> 4) teen recreation programs <br /> The purpose of the 1988 residential sur- 5) restrooms in parks <br /> vey was to solicit citizen input regarding <br /> Lino Lakes services and facilities. The ° The five least desired additions to <br /> survey placed particular emphasis on park facilities and activities were <br /> opinions regarding park services and 1) indoor ice arena <br /> facilities, as well as community growth is- 2) outdoor swimming pool <br /> sues. 3) indoor swimming pool <br /> snowmobile trails (tie) <br /> The major results of the survey can be 5) exercise courses <br /> summarized as follows: <br /> ° Opinions were split on the need for <br /> ° The five most favorably rated city a park improvement tax increase. <br /> services were Forty-six percent of the respondents <br /> 1) city snowplowing did not support any tax increase. <br /> 2) police services <br /> 3) private garbage collection However, another forty-six percent <br /> 4) street maintenance did support some type of increase. <br /> 5) ambulance/ Of those supporting a tax increase, <br /> medical emergency services most favored a $10 increase (22%), <br /> some favored a $20 increase (16%), <br /> ° The five least favorably rated city but very few favored a $40 increase <br /> services were (8%). <br /> 1) street lighting <br /> 2) animal control ° 65% of the residents believed that <br /> 3) bus transportation recreation programs should be paid <br /> 4) assessing department by user fees, 27% by taxes and user <br /> 5) economic development activities fees, and 1% by property taxes. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.