My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/06/1988 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1988 Park Board Packets
>
06/06/1988 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:06:01 PM
Creation date
6/11/2021 3:31:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
06/06/1988
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
QUESTION 1 <br /> CITY SERVICES AND FACILITIES <br /> In this question, residents were asked <br /> to rate from excellent to poor the <br /> facilities and services currently avail- <br /> able in Lino Lakes. Respondents <br /> rated services in the major areas of <br /> public safety, public works, com- <br /> munity development, and parks. <br /> The major results of this question can be open-ended question on community <br /> summarized as follows: needs. <br /> ° The five most favorably rated city Similarly, a desire for economic develop- <br /> services (as rated good or excel- ment was expressed throughout the sur- <br /> lent) were vey. Respondents in Question #5 on <br /> 1) city snowplowing community development and Question <br /> 2) police services #7 on what Lino Lakes really needs be- <br /> 3) private garbage collection came clear majorities who favor en- <br /> 4) street maintenance - hanced economic development efforts -- <br /> 5) ambulance/medical emergency they indicated strong desire for more res- <br /> services taurants, more major retail estab- <br /> lishments and greater business growth. <br /> ° The five least favorably rated city <br /> services (as rated below average or Although many respondents favored a <br /> poor) were broad-based desire for more develop- <br /> 1) street lighting ment, there were some who wanted slow <br /> 2) animal control or no growth -- "I like things the way they <br /> 3) bus transportation are," and "Don't try to turn this city into a <br /> 4) assessing department Minneapolis," etc. <br /> 5) economic development activities <br /> Thus, there appears to be a bit of a push <br /> In general, the results speak for themsel- and pull situation. 41% of the survey <br /> ves. Many of these ratings were reflected respondents in Question #5 indicated <br /> in other sections of the survey, as well. support for more emphasis on develop- <br /> ing an industrial park, as compared to <br /> Improved street lighting showed up as 18% opposed. Yet the number one <br /> one of the greatest needs identified in the response to the question on the best <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.