My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/05/1992 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1992 Park Board Packets
>
10/05/1992 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:44:03 PM
Creation date
6/18/2021 10:31:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/05/1992
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
nn 8-Implementation Plan City of Lino Lakes <br /> sure continuity in the priority ranking process, <br /> stablished evaluation criteria and matrices <br /> I be used as the basis for reevaluating the Step 4: Develop A Phasuogjlnmplementation Plan step I Capital)<mproMment Plan <br /> ty rankings. By doing so, Previous priority for Acquisition and Development of Park Land <br /> W can be used for comparison,justification <br /> iy revisions,and tracking changes over time. Through a process involving participation by the <br /> Based on the priority rankings and bmeframe Parks & Recreation Board, city staff, and City <br /> categories, a Phasmg/Implenatatatioa Plan can be Council, the mplementation Plan should <br /> k Develop Phasing Thnef ame Categories for developed which defines the optimal phasing of be further deduced to fit into the city's short and <br /> isition and Development of Park Land acquisition and development of specific parks and long-tam Capital Impmvement Plan(C3. <br /> facilities. <br /> The difference between the Phasing/Implementation <br /> ally,the acquisition and development of park The plan illustrates the priority rank and timeframe Plan as defined in this document and the C1P is that <br /> nust be phased so that the community's park in which specific projects should ideally be the latter puts the various park system improvement <br /> e creation needs are met in a timely fashion implemented based on the actual and perceived initiatives in the same contest as other community <br /> remaining within the cis ability to fiord the needs of the community. development initiatives. <br /> is projects. <br /> Naturally, it would be ideal to pursue the The transition fiom the Phasing f Implementation <br /> xomplish this objective, timeframes must be implementation of the park system plan in strict Plan to the C P is perhaps best defined as going <br /> fished that define the most appropriate time accordance with the established schedule.However, from the optimal-within the singular contest of the <br /> ich the various park development initiatives this desire must be balanced against the realities of park system's development-to the realistic-within <br /> I be undertaken. finding availability and other non-park related the more complex, multifaceted context of the j <br /> community needs. community`s overall development. <br /> imefranmes must be defined enough to be <br /> able yet flexible enough to allow adequate Ultimately, it will be the responsibility of the As would be expected,the availability and timing of p <br /> tunity for funding sources to evolve. implementing agencies CLe, Parks and Recreation finding from the various sources will have a direct <br /> Board and City Council) and city residents to and significant impact on how the Phasing/ <br /> illowing defines the Timeframe Categories for determine the pace in which implementation is Implementation Plan is incorporated into the CIP <br /> quisition and development of park land undertaken. <br /> Given the Phasing/Implementation Plan,along with <br /> xy#L•1992-IM Figure 85-Acquisition and Development Phasing/ the overall amount of finding that will be needed to <br /> ny#7:1996-2WO Implementation Plan illustrates each component of finance the park land acquisition and development <br /> ny#12WI-Beyond the park system in the order of their priority rank initiatives, the challenge to the community, <br /> and defines: governing bodies,and city staff will be to. <br /> Ad be expected,the timeframes become less " <br /> 1 as they are projected further into the future their estimated acquisition and development determine and evaluate the most appropriate <br /> because it becomes more difficult to costs and available financing sources or debt financing <br /> ine with certainty when the demand for a structure. <br /> park or facility will manifest itself optimal phasing/implementation,schedule <br /> Y: <br /> • determine the most appropriate use of the <br /> i the priority rankings,the timeframes must potential financing sources. available finding. <br /> iewed on a periodic basis and either <br /> led or modified as appropriate to ensure that • determine the most appropriate time to initiate <br /> evelopment is in line with the needs of the implementation of the park system plan. <br /> pity. <br /> 8-3 <br /> { EI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.