10/05/1992 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

. 5 Section 8-Implementation Plan Ch'of Lino Lakes Figure U(Part 2 of 2� Pri ely Ranking Matra-Park Land Acgnisibian High Priority/Concern " [Q] Moderate Priority/Concern LOw'P"""`I/COtiOCTl1 Priority Ranking Sedr-1 through— (1 Being Moat hVortrmt) Park Site Pads Type Park Aacagt: Est.Ao4 Cast • _ , Exist. future Tote! N-D(Brandywood Park) Neighborhood Park 5.0 Ac 3.0 Ac &0 Ac. 32SAM O 10 N-14 neighborhood Part none 6.0 Ac. 6.0 Ac. $3i= a e,- N-15 Neighborhood Park none 10.0 Ac 10.0 Ac. WAW-S6g000 O 16 41(Country Lakes Park) Community Park 22A Ac 9.0 Am 31.0 Ac $45,000 O O O 11 C.2 Community Part None 36A Ac. 3"Ac 5200AW-$250 W O Of 12 - :r A-1 Athletic Complex 27.0 Ac 33.0 Ac CaO Ac. $57,000-$64AW O 5 A4 Youth Athletic Fields(W/Neighborhood Park) 20A Ac. None 20.0 Ac None A-3 Athletic Complex None su 50.0 Ac $200 OW 5250,000 7 JLT-1(UW Lakes Ekm.) Youth Athletic Fields and Neighborhood Pule 20A None 20.0 A- None NEW AT-2(Birch Street Ekm.) Youth Athletic Fields 15A None 15.0 Ac None AJ-3(Cent.School Dist.) Neighborhood Park 10.0 None 1a0 Ac. None JU 4(Rica Creek Park) Neighborhood Part 10.0 None 10.0 Ac None Rice Creek Park Regional Park Reserve 2500+Ac None 2500+Ac. None i t : •- Actual acquisition and development poets will depend upon:a)the actual land values at the time of acquisition;b)the actual program for development at the time of development based on community and neighborhood input;c)site specific physical characteristics(such as grades,soils,availability of utilities,etc.)affecting the development of each park;c)the actual construction costs at the time of development;and d)what portion of the costs can be offset through alternative funding programs:volunteerism,grants,donations,etc The cost estimates as shown are based on:a)estimated land values F (in 199E dollars)as determined by the city;and b)typical development costs('m 1992 dollars)as determined by industry cost-to-construct averages for parks of similar size and scope.The cost estimate for each park is based an that parks optimal level of development and therefore do not reflect the affect that funding limitations may have on their developwat.Also,the cost estimates are based on each paws current condition and does not consider the costs associated with replacing existing facilities and amenities that are currently in reasonable shape but may"wear-out'in the forthcoming years.These poets should be factored in as appropriate when the cost estimates for each park are updated in the future. `