08/03/1992 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board 2 August 12, 1992 Mr. Mesich asked if Cottage Homesteads was a National Company and was advised that they are Minnesota based. They also have a few other developments in the state and they average 80-90 units. He also expressed concern regarding no basements and what to do in case of severe weather. Mr. Derek stated that Minnesota is rather unique in that most construction has basements and added that none will be provided due to cost and the fact that seniors like to avoid stairs if at all possible. The questions was raised concerning putting a basement under the proposed community center but Mr. Derek stated it would be too costly as handicapped access would be necessary along with other design constraints. Landscaping along the north property line will be provided in the form of 6, 8, and 10 foot evergreens. The exterior is sided with aluminum and refuse and snow removal will be handled by the management. Tom Meisch asked if the Fire Chief had reviewed the plans for this development and was advised by Mr. Brixius that he had and his only concern was hydrant location. Kathy Nordine asked if this proposed construction is not ,•� carried out will the property remain R4 thus allowing any high density residential use. Mr. Brixius explained that the PDO designation provides for the development of the property as approved with a signed development agreement. If this developer does not construct the units, another developer would be required to meet the approved plan or resubmit the proposal. Mr. Meisch stated that although he believes this type of housing is needed in the City of Lino Lakes he has concerns regarding the width of Elm Street in relation to additional traffic and the lack of nearby shopping and sidewalks. Mr. Dereck stated that there will be a comprehensive sidewalk plan within the development and again, that transportation will be available for the seniors. Kathy Nordine asked if these units could be converted to market rate apartments and was advised by Mr. Brixius that if that were the case he would have a substantially different staff report on the project due to traffic concerns. Mr. Meisch asked if the Rezoning, PDO, and Site Plan Review are all tied together and was advised by Mr. Brixius that he would recommend such. MOTION: Mr. Meisch then made a motion to deny the request as submitted. Kathy Nordine seconded the motion. On roll call: AYES: Meisch, Nordine NAYS: Gelbmann, Landers, Robinson, Slatten Motion Failed. Mr. Gelbman then moved approval of the request with the conditions outlined in the Planning Report and the additional condition that the Developer return to the Planning & Zoning Board within the next two months with a detailed site plan.