My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/01/1993 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1993 Park Board Packets
>
03/01/1993 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:18:46 PM
Creation date
6/18/2021 1:36:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
03/01/1993
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R BOARD MEETING <br /> =<y 91 1990 !! <br /> zr <br /> other option was leasing the land from Anoka County for <br /> rk land. <br /> ;r <br /> ne of the Rice Lake Estates resident felt that if they a <br /> Oeased land from Circle Pines, it would only have street <br /> ccess from Circle Pines. Marty explained that trails could ` <br /> e constructed leading to the park from Rice Lake Estates. <br /> ohn Tennesen likes the idea of the intersection of Blue <br /> geron Drive and Sandhill creating a tot lot. <br /> i <br /> The option of selling the two lots that were part of the park <br /> dedication, and claiming the outlot as park dedication. Then <br /> tennis courts could be installed in that parcel. <br /> Marty Asleson felt that Anoka County would be willing to <br /> incorporate part of their land for a tot lot. <br /> Marty stated that he will check in to all the options and <br /> pole the neighborhood, get the residents together and find <br /> out what they would like for the park. <br /> 3 <br /> ;Candy Toffoli stated that she considers herself a citizen of <br /> the City of Lino Lakes and she doesn't feel that each <br /> neighborhood should have a say as to where their park should <br /> be and what should be in it, because no one would want to <br /> .. have the park in "their back yard". She also felt that it <br /> : isn't good practice to wait until the development is 50% <br /> completed, because of course, nobody would want the traffic, <br /> =Nand park next to their lot. <br /> .` Marty stated that ideally the land should be dedicated before <br /> the houses go in. Then have a neighborhood meeting to decide <br /> x, <br /> what to put into the park land that was dedicated. <br /> Ray Johnson stated that the park dedication at this site has <br /> a little different circumstance than the usual. <br /> Marty stated that normally, residents do appreciate being <br /> ' included in deciding what will be in their neighborhood park. <br /> Ray Johnson disagrees with a neighborhood meeting once the <br /> development is 50% complete. <br /> CONSIDERATION OF PARR DEDICATION FOR BRANDYROOD/STEDE <br /> JOHNSTON FROM MERILLA & ASSOCIATES. <br /> At 6:00 the park board members toured the proposed park site <br /> for Brandywood. <br /> This is a 70 lot subdivision of 37 acres. <br /> Development will occur in phases. the plat is heavily <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.