My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2021-059 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2021
>
2021-059 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2021 9:04:37 AM
Creation date
6/22/2021 9:04:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
06/14/2021
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Resolution #
21-59
Resolution Title
Resolution Authorizing the Preparation of a Water Treatment Plant Pilot Study
Resolution Date Passed
06/14/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> RESOLUTION NO.21-59 <br /> RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A WATER TREATMENT <br /> PLANT PILOT STUDY <br /> WHEREAS,the City Council,is evaluating short,mid and long term options to reduce <br /> manganese levels in the municipal water supply, and <br /> WHEREAS,the construction of a Water Treatment Plant is a possible course of action for the <br /> City to evaluate. and <br /> WHEREAS,WSB and Associates,the City Engineer,has complete a Feasibility Study <br /> addressing water treatment needs. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by The City Council of The City of Lino Lakes: <br /> 1. The Water Treatment Plant Pilot Study is hereby ordered. <br /> 2. WSB and Associates are directed to prepare the Pilot Study for Water Treatment <br /> in an amount not exceed$26,400. <br /> Adopted by the Council of the City of Lino Lakes this 14th day of June, 2021. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Councilmember <br /> Cavegn and was duly seconded by Councilmember Stoesz and upon vote being taken <br /> thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Cavegn, Stoesz, Ruhland, Lyden, Rafferty <br /> The following voted against same: None <br /> 11". 4 h-tt� .. j <br /> Ro Rafferty, ayor <br /> ATTEST: <br /> i nne Bartell, City,Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.