My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/07/1996 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1996 Park Board Packets
>
10/07/1996 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:49:04 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 9:12:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/07/1996
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� ; U <br /> Questions and Answers <br /> Here are some answers to questions we anticipate you may have about the <br /> petitions and our proposed park plan. <br /> Why are we presenting petitions to the Council rather than the Park Board? <br /> The City Clerk told us that this is the petition process. In any case, we <br /> spoke at the last Park Board meeting to give them copies of the petitions, <br /> and tell them that we'd obtained over 400 signatures on each one and <br /> that we'd be presenting the petitions to the City Council. (Incidentally, the <br /> Park Board said that to change the master plan, we must do petitions.) <br /> What could be done to address the concerns of the people bordering the <br /> park who want to keep the plan as-is? <br /> A lot has already been done. The Park and Rec. Dept. has already <br /> addressed privacy concerns in a variety of ways. For example, they have <br /> created various burms in and around the park, they've moved trees from <br /> within the park over to property lines, and they've put in a budget request <br /> for additional treestshrubs around the park. In addition, residents <br /> bordering the park convinced the Park Board to move the playground to a <br /> 11-N location that's almost out of site of their homes-against the desires of <br /> other residents. Also, residents bordering the park wanted neutral <br /> colored equipment, which is what was ordered. <br /> As for placement of other proposed park elements, the only place that <br /> residents bordering the park seem to agree on is having everything <br /> moved to the unaquired land, which is unacceptable to the 400+ people <br /> signing the petitions. <br /> What are our primary reasons for wanting to change the park's master plan <br /> to the proposed plan? <br /> Residents have many reasons. Many residents support the petitions due <br /> to the following reasons: <br /> • Before I moved here, realtors showed us the space and plan for a park <br /> in the neighborhood. I've lived here for almost 5 years and there's <br /> hardly anything in the park. <br /> • There is a lot of unused space in the currently available park land, so <br /> we'd rather have additional recreational opportunities added to this <br /> space rather than waiting years for the smaller, unacquired land. <br /> Besides, the currently available land is a lot closer to all of our homes, <br /> it's much easier to access, and there are multiple access points to it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.