My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/05/1996 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1996 Park Board Packets
>
08/05/1996 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:29:49 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 10:03:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
08/05/1996
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 172 P09 AUG 05 '96 11:21 <br /> ' I would like to read you a list of city forestry programs. For <br /> each one, please rate its effectiveness as excellent, good, only <br /> fair, or poor. If you are unsure about a program, just say <br /> so . . . . <br /> EXC GOO FAI POO DKR <br /> 48 . Planting of trees along city <br /> boulevards? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 49 . Tree preservation? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 50 . Oak Wilt program for disease <br /> control? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> As you may know, diseased and dying trees can also be problems on <br /> residential and commercial property. Some people feel that the <br /> City should be able to require property owners to remove or not <br /> remove trees, healthy or otherwise, from private property. <br /> Others feel that the City should not be able to require owners to <br /> take actions about trees on their private property. How about <br /> you? <br /> 51 . Should the City of Lino Lakes have YES/STRONGLY. . . . . . . . . . . .1 <br /> that power, or not? (WAIT FOR RE- YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> SPONSE) Do you feel strongly that NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 <br /> way? NO/STRONGLY. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 <br /> DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 5 <br /> Changing topics. . . . <br /> I would like to read you a list of a few city services. For each <br /> one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the <br /> service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor. . . . <br /> EXCL GOOD FAIR POOR DK/R <br /> 52 . Snow plowing? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 53 . Police services? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 54 . Fire protection? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 55 . City street repair and <br /> maintenance? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 56 . Sewers and water? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 57. Drainage and flood <br /> control? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> 58 . Animal control? 1 2 3 4 5 <br /> FOR EACH "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" RESPONSE, ASK: <br /> 59. Why did you rate as (only fair/poor) ? <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.