Laserfiche WebLink
6129296166 DECISION RESOURSES 173 P02/0E AUG 05 '96 11:24 <br /> MANY FEW/ ABT DK/ <br /> /MCH LITT RGHT REFD <br /> 137. heavy manufacturing industry? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 138 . service and retail establish- <br /> ments? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 139 . entertainment and dining <br /> establishments? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 140 . fulltime job opportunities? 1 2 3 4 <br /> I would like to read you a list of traffic issues. For each one, <br /> please tell me if you think it is a major problem, minor problem, <br /> or not a problem at all on your residential street . If you have <br /> no opinion, just say so. . . . <br /> MAJOR MINOR NOTPR DKREF <br /> 141. Traffic speeds? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 142 . Traffic volume? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 143 . Children playing? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 144 . Physical condition of <br /> the street? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 145 . Pedestrians walking <br /> in the roadway? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 146 . Bicyclists in the <br /> roadway? 1 2 3 4 <br /> 147 . How would you rate the overall EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> condition of city streets in Lino GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> Lakes -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> fair, or poor? POOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 <br /> DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 5 <br /> The Lino Lakes City Charter limits street maintenance practices <br /> of the city. Under the Charter, the City may only reconstruct a <br /> street if the improvement is supported and entirely paid for by <br /> the affected property owners. <br /> 148 . Prior to this survey, were you YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> aware of these Charter provisions? NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 <br /> 149 . Would you favor or oppose a City FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> Charter change allowing the use OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br /> of public funds for street recon- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 3 <br /> struction so that the cost to <br /> affected property owners were <br /> based on the amount their property <br /> value has increased? <br /> 150 . Would you support or oppose spend- SUPPORT/STILL FAVOR. . . . . 1 <br /> ing increased city funds on more SUPPORT/NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 <br /> traffic enforcement? (IF "SUP- SUPPORT/DON'T KNOW. . . . . .3 <br /> PORT, " ASK: ) Would you still favor OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 <br /> it if a property tax increase were DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . . 5 <br /> required to fund it? <br /> 15 <br />