My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/06/1996 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1996 Park Board Packets
>
05/06/1996 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 2:52:55 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 10:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/06/1996
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: March 27, 1996 <br /> From: Marty Asleson <br /> To: Lino Lakes Parks and Recreation Board <br /> Subject: Survey Questions <br /> My thoughts on survey questions: <br /> 1. Sustainability in the natural resource portion of the <br /> recreation experience, ie does the additional expense of land <br /> acquisition for the purpose of buffer strips and greenway <br /> projects have funding importance. �r� iz <br /> .� ^, L^vG itiaa.twt L` S(:w't � �,C(.• ..),/) J rj4%� �-Z �t/�Ci f'[ <br /> 2. Expanded recreation program needs. <br /> • Teens, teen center, programming support <br /> ADA, paying a fair share of a consortium based <br /> program. <br /> Youth programming in general, junior and senior high <br /> Seniors, ex. , senior softball,volleyball, basketball <br /> etc. leagues. <br /> Other <br /> 3. Open Space <br /> Athletic Complex, Funding for, site, development <br /> funding methods, taxpayer costs, willingness to fund raise for <br /> development. Just received word of funding recommendation for <br /> our Athletic Complex from DNR to State Legislature (land <br /> acquisition) Is there a support for funding this comp plan issue. <br /> Neighborhood parks, Park site amenities--Trails, <br /> Hard court(BB cts, tennis cts) , picnic shelters or open picnic <br /> areas, replacement of deteriorating playground equipment, or <br /> additional play structure(equipment) , informal ball fields, turf <br /> quality(natural vs.cultured) rinks, plantings, benches, <br /> fountains, v-ball, other. Prioritize and determine willingness <br /> to financially support. <br /> Ice rink facilities, use of ponds vs. formalized <br /> skating facilities.How much pond use is occurring in the <br /> .neighborhoods _on a self use basis. <br /> Trails, support for additional monies for trail <br /> development. Also, it has been indicated that trails through the <br /> regional: park are a desirable thing. How do you feel these <br /> trails should be paid for given the funding for these trails is <br /> appropriated through Metropolitan Council and monies may not -be <br /> available for at least 5 years? <br /> 1. Wait for funding. <br /> 2. Budget city dollars to install trail sections. <br /> 3. other ideas <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.