My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/01/1996 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1996 Park Board Packets
>
04/01/1996 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:27:20 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 11:06:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
04/01/1996
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. t <br /> 14 . How would you rate the sense of VERY STRONG. . . . . . . . . . .I8k <br /> community identity among residents SOMEWHAT STRONG. . . . . . . 60* <br /> in Shoreview -- would you say it NOT TOO STRONG. . . . . . . .17% <br /> is very strong, somewhat strong, NOT AT ALL STRONG. . . . . .4V <br /> not too strong, or not at all DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . .2* <br /> strong? <br /> 15. Thinking about your ties to the CITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .351- <br /> local area, do you feel most SCHOOL DISTRICT. . . . . . .29* <br /> closely connected to the City of SOMETHING ELSE. . . . . . . .28k <br /> Shoreview, your school district, NOTHING (VOL) . . . . . . . . . . 6-1 <br /> or something else? (IF "SOMETHING DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . .34 <br /> ELSE, " ASK: ) What is that? <br /> Let ' s discuss recreational opportunities in the community. . . . <br /> 16. How would you rate park and rec- EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . .61%- <br /> reational facilities in Shoreview GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32-1 <br /> -- excellent, good, only fair, or ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6V <br /> poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I% <br /> DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . .19c <br /> The Shoreview Park System is composed of a number of facilities . <br /> For each of the following, please tell me if you or any members <br /> of this household have visited that facility during the past <br /> year_ For those household members who have visited, would you <br /> say they use the facility frequently, occasionally, or rarely <br /> �., during the appropriate seasons. <br /> NOT FREQ OCCA RARE DK/R <br /> 17. Bucher (BOOK-ER) Park 57%- 12%- 15k 13%- 4k <br /> 18 . Lake Judy Park 71* 8& 6g lilt 3%- <br /> 19. McCullough Park 46%- 18k 224; 11!k 21k <br /> 20 . Shamrock Park 59s ilk 16* 3%- <br /> 21 . Shoreview Commons 26k 32* 28V 11-1 3%- <br /> 22 . Sitzer Park 55"s 15% 14* 12%r 4%- <br /> 23 . Bobby Theisen (TIE-SON) Park 54V 13%- 15* 14V 5-1 <br /> 24. Wilson Park 55% 10v 16%- 15V 4t- <br /> 25 . How would you rate the upkeep and EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 37%- <br /> maintenance of Shoreview City GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56%- <br /> Parks -- would you say excellent, ONLY FA.IR. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2V <br /> good, only fair, or poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0-t <br /> DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . . 6V <br /> 26. Do you feel that the current mix YES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9it <br /> of recreational facilities in city NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6!k <br /> parks meets the needs of members DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. . . . .4V <br /> of your household? <br /> IF "NO, " ASK: <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.