My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/01/1996 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1996 Park Board Packets
>
04/01/1996 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:27:20 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 11:06:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
04/01/1996
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC:ISICIN RE=01_IPC:Ec; 5r,1 PL_tr, Jr'H 24 r. 19: 1 <br /> IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR, " ASK: <br /> 49 . How should -taxpayer' s money be spent differently? <br /> [N=100] `~f <br /> NO ANSWER, 23%; TAX LESS, 11%; LESS ON PARK & REC, <br /> 9W; ONLY ESSENTIALS, 22$; WATCH DEVELOPMENT, 8%; <br /> IMPROVE ROADS, 7%; MORE POLICE, 12t; MORE ON SCHOOLS, <br /> 59k; SCATTERED RESPONSES, 3%. <br /> 50 . How has taxpayer's money been used poorly? [Nz100] <br /> NO ANSWER, 43%; OVERTAX, 15%; STREETS, 12%; <br /> REDEVELOPMENT, 10; SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS, 51r; <br /> _ SOCIAL CONCERNS, 4%; NOT ON POLICE, 4%; OTHER, 3t. <br /> In addition to asking about city services, I would like to ask <br /> you some questions about your neighborhood. Please tell for each <br /> of the following items, whether you are very satisfied, somewhat <br /> satisfied, not too satisfied, or no'c at all satisfied. If you <br /> feel the statement does not apply to your neighborhood or you <br /> don' t know, just say so. . . . . <br /> VSAT SSAT NTOO NALL DKR <br /> 52 . The condition and appearance of <br /> single family housing in your <br /> neighborhood. 38t 50w 4% OW 8% <br /> 53 . The condition and appearance of <br /> duplexes in your neighborhood. 10w 38t 6k 3w 43* <br /> 54 . The condition and appearance of <br /> apartment buildings in your <br /> neighborhood. 13k 43t 7W 4t 33% <br /> 55 . The condition and appearance of <br /> your home. 585� 37t 3% it 19k <br /> 56 . The safety of your home. 52% 42t 4& 1t 1t <br /> 57 . Your neighborhood is a safe <br /> place to Jive. 42$ 524; 4W 1t 1%_ <br /> 58 . The availability of parks and <br /> recreational areas. 40t 54t 3% 1% 2%� <br /> 59 . Your confidence in the future <br /> of your neighborhood as a good <br /> place to live. 37% 52t 6%_ 3%- 2!C <br /> 60 . Access and availability to <br /> bikeways and walkways. 251; 57%; 9W 3t 6W <br /> 61 . Access to bus routes. 27%; 51% 5% 3* 15w <br /> 62 . Neighborhood street lighting. 22t 56t 13t 7$ 2% <br /> Consolidation of governmental services has been a topic in the <br /> State legislature for a couple of years_ Some policy makers feel <br /> that several cities could work together or cities and counties <br /> could combine certain departments, such as police, public works <br /> and fire, to create larger, more cost effective and efficient <br /> operations . Others argue that bigger is not necessarily better <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.