My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/02/1996 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1996 Park Board Packets
>
12/02/1996 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:59:12 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 1:47:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
12/02/1996
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1996 City of Lino Lakes Residential Survey 2 <br /> Quality of Life Rating: <br /> A strong ninety-three percent rated the quality of life in Lino Lakes as"excellent"or"good;" <br /> only seven percent rated it lower. This rating placed the community within the top quartile <br /> across the Metropolitan Area. <br /> When asked to recall what factors were most important in their decision to settle in Lino Lakes, <br /> twenty-eight percent pointed to the rural nature of the area and its open spaces. Convenient <br /> location was mentioned by nineteen percent, while good schools were key to eighteen percent. <br /> Thirteen percent viewed the housing stock as key. Strong neighborhood were critical to six <br /> percent,and four percent mentioned the peacefulness and quiet of the community. <br /> Like Most and Least about the Community: <br /> Rural ambience and openness was the most liked feature of the city. At twenty-six percent it far <br /> outdistanced all other responses. Convenient location ranked next highest at seventeen percent. <br /> Quiet and peacefulness, followed by good schools,ranked next, at twelve percent and eleven <br /> percent, respectively. Strong neighborhoods and"nice people"followed, at eight and seven <br /> percent, respectively. Smaller numbers mentioned feeling safe, housing stock,clean <br /> environment,parks and recreational opportunities, and small town ambience. <br /> Examining things liked least,two factors dominated everything else: high taxes was cited by <br /> twenty-three percent,while overpopulation and high growth was posted by twenty-one percent. <br /> City government and shopping opportunities ranked next,at nine percent and seven percent each. <br /> City services were a complaint by five percent. Smaller numbers pointed to crime,traffic <br /> congestion, overcrowded schools,poor location,and road conditions. But, it was also <br /> noteworthy that thirteen percent reported there was"nothing"they disliked about the community; <br /> this"booster" segment was well above the Metropolitan Area norm. <br /> The trade-offs between the pace of development,rural ambience and open space,high taxes, and <br /> high quality schools comprise the four corners of the"rectangle of controversy." Balancing these <br /> concerns will be the chief challenge for decision-makers during the next five years. <br /> Most Serious Issue Facing the City: <br /> Overpopulation and high growth rate was cited by forty-one percent as the most serious issue <br /> facing the City of Lino Lakes today. High taxes followed next at twenty-two percent. Crime and <br /> overcrowded schools were pointed to by eight percent and seven percent,respectively. Smaller <br /> numbers cited city government,city services, and the condition of roads. While high growth rate <br /> 2rDRL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.