Laserfiche WebLink
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> April 8, 1998 <br /> Page 8 <br /> creating two additional storm ponds. He stated that the requirements that Mr. Brixius <br /> mentioned are acceptable, however,they would prefer the right-of-way be split 50/50. <br /> Mr. Robinson asked for verification on proposed access over Ditch 10, if it turned to the <br /> right and came back out by the Fina. Mr. Corson concurred with that and explained that <br /> they wanted it to line up with the Village property. Mr. Robinson asked who owned <br /> the property at the end of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Corson stated it was all separate property <br /> owners. He explained how it lined up across the street showing the large parcel and <br /> boundary which is zoned for multi-family. Mr. Robinson stated that it was the north <br /> boundary of the church. Mr. Corson reviewed the map again showing the boundary <br /> lines. Mr. Robinson expressed concern about the crossing over Ditch 10 and stated that it <br /> will be quite a project as it is very deep. <br /> Mr. Trehus asked for verification on the blue and green bordered wetland area. Mr. <br /> Corson said that the green would become wetland and the blue was what they were <br /> digging out to become storm water. <br /> Mr. Dunn asked what the expected schedule was and Mr. Corson explained that they <br /> would like to start this sometime this summer, noting that he had prepared the colored <br /> map for them to get the idea of the concept and to show where the roads and buildings <br /> would be. <br /> Mr. Brixius asked if they had pursued a County Access Permit. Mr. Corson stated that <br /> they had not yet received an official response from the County. Mr. Brixius suggested <br /> that they make the permit a condition of plat approval. <br /> Mr. Robinson asked if he thought the County would require a light there, noting that they <br /> did require one at Elm Street. He explained that the City's Comprehensive Plan stated <br /> that Elm Street and Village Drive would be two signaled areas, leaving the access in the <br /> middle without a light. <br /> Mr. Trehus asked if any of the current right-of-way for the temporary cul-de-sac would <br /> be outside of Rehbein's property. Mr. Corson explained that they would not, as the cul- <br /> de-sac comes up to the property and the proposed right-of-way dedication is entirely on <br /> his property. <br /> Mr. Ken Skogland, 4170 Lake Drive, came forward and stated he did like the plan, except <br /> for the proposed road crossing the ditch. He explained that a road was also proposed in <br /> 1981 and it was turned down by the DNR, although he did not know why. He questioned <br /> why the school would want a black topped area going to the Village Hall area, as they are <br /> in two different school districts. <br /> r... <br />