My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/04/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
05/04/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 2:55:16 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 2:57:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
05/04/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES MARCH 16, 1998 <br /> looking for a site and to hold off on making further plans for the referendum but not - <br /> completely disregard the possibility of a bond referendum. <br /> Rick noted that the Centennial School District will be placing a bond referendum on the <br /> November, 1998 election ballot. If the City wishes to also place a bond referendum on the <br /> ballot, he would suggest the Council consider Schedule I attached to these minutes which <br /> provides details on what would be included in the bond referendum for park and trail <br /> purposes. This Schedule outlined three (3)different options for the bond and the tax <br /> impact on a$125,000, $150,000 and a$200,000 house. <br /> The Council discussed several sites for the athletic complex. Andy asked about the 40 <br /> acres owned by Centennial School on Birch Street. Rick explained that he had talked to <br /> Mr. McClellan who said that the district plans to build a pre-school/kindergarten facility <br /> on that site. He also noted that Centennial School is also unwilling to allow the <br /> development of temporary soccer fields at this site. <br /> Kim asked Brian if he had discussed some sites with Rick. Brian said yes and noted that <br /> Rick has been talking to Gerald Rehbein who owns land north of Main Street between I- <br /> 35E and 20th Avenue. Brian also noted that Rick has talked to Paul Montain about <br /> property on Centerville Road and Birch Street. Rick has also talked to North Oaks. This <br /> group owns land in Lino Lakes on the south side of County Road J(Ash Street). Rick <br /> was told that there will be residential development in that area with a neighborhood park. <br /> There would not be enough land for an athletic complex. <br /> Kim said that if a referendum is pursued, she would favor bonding for all of the park <br /> needs. <br /> John suggested asking the landowners of prospective athletic complex sites if they are not <br /> interested in selling to the City at this time,would they entertain an option on the <br /> property or the right of first refusal. Either situation would help identify the future site of <br /> the complex. <br /> FUNDING SOURCES <br /> AREA AND UNIT CHARGE FUND - Brian explained that this fund has a fund balance <br /> in excess of$4,000,000. He noted that this is a healthy fund however, it has not been <br /> adjusted to reflect the impact of the Shoreview Joint Powers Agreement. Brian said he <br /> was very conservative in estimating the Area and Unit Charge Fund needs in the funding <br /> he proposes. He noted that the SAC Fund contains enough dollars to resolve issues with <br /> the fund. Caroline asked when the Council will know the outcome of the Shoreview <br /> situation. Brian explained at the last work session in April. The SAC Fund concern will <br /> be addressed at the first Council work session in April. <br /> John asked Brian and Dave Ahrens if they have identified all the major items that can <br /> impact the Area and Unit Fund in the next five (5) years. Dave said the lift station issues �..• <br /> PAGE 4 <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.