Laserfiche WebLink
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> January 14, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> V. ACTION ITEMS <br /> A Continuation of Public Hearing,Telecommunication Ordinance <br /> Chair Schaps opened the continuation of this public hearing at 6:36 p.m. <br /> Mr. Brixius explained that development of this ordinance has been ongoing for <br /> approximately five months. He indicated that his hope was to present enough <br /> information at this time to close the public hearing. <br /> Prior to reviewing the current draft of the ordinance, Mr. Brixius directed the Board's <br /> attention to the November 19, 1997 opinion of the City Attorney's office. This opinion <br /> was based upon a previous draft of the ordinance, and expresses clearly that the <br /> Telecommunications Act gives Lino Lakes the authority,through zoning, to regulate the <br /> placement, construction and modification of personal wireless service facilities. <br /> However, the opinion went on to caution that <br /> IN GENERAL. No state or local statute or regulation, <br /> or other state or local legal requirement, may prohibit or <br /> have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to <br /> provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications <br /> services. <br /> Mr. Brixius stated that the draft ordinance upon which this opinion was based <br /> incorporated placement of telecommunication antennas and towers in various zoning <br /> designations, including commercial, industrial and semi-public. The opinion expresses <br /> agreement with the appropriateness of placing them within these zones, providing the <br /> City is not limiting tower or service ability to the community and that the ordinance <br /> cannot be interpreted to be so restrictive as to prevent adequate provision of this utility. <br /> The first draft ordinance was more lenient. Concerns addressed were placement of <br /> towers and/or antennas with respect to aesthetic and environmental impact on the <br /> community. The December 4 draft, which was forwarded to the Planning Commission in <br /> December, includes a number of changes. Mr. Brixius mentioned that a meeting had <br /> taken place with MnDOT and U.S. West at which two issues were discussed: (1) <br /> Placement of a personal wireless service antenna for use by U.S. West, and (2) location of <br /> an emergency public safety tower for MnDOT which would serve State patrol, Anoka <br /> County including the local correctional facility, and some local police band radio <br /> communications. <br /> In review of the 12/4/97 draft ordinance, Mr. Brixius directed the Board's attention first <br /> to Section 1, which consists of pertinent definitions. Section 1.1. through 1.6. refer to the <br /> various types of antennas and their distinctly separate treatment. Mr. Brixius reviewed <br /> certain additional definitions of particular note, such as Secondary Use. He pointed out �. <br />