04/06/1998 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning&Zoning Board February 11, 1998 Page 6 existing or intended character of the vicinity, will not change such character, etc. Chair Schaps suggested that reference to "intended character" is a critical element. Mr. Brixius stated that the City Council is concerned that conditional use permits might be used to circumvent the ordinance for the purpose of creating a non-occupancy structure primarily for the purpose of antenna location. Chair Schaps pointed out that the Communications Act is fairly rigid in its allowance of restrictions. He asked if Staff and consultants agree that the current, revised ordinance is within the spirit and intent of the Act. Mr. Brixius responded in the affirmative, adding that the initial drafts offered a more lenient opportunity for tower placement. The current draft ordinance is based upon directives received throughout the review process. Mr. Brixius also agreed that the present ordinance will be subject to future amendment. Mr. Johnson agreed with Mr. Herr's assessment, adding that the City must remain alert to requests and to feedback from users. Peter Beck of AT&T addressed the Board, stating that the current ordinance offers a workable base for telecommunication service. He expressed two requests: The first, with respect to the administrative review process, that the 60-day period be reduced; and, second, that setbacks within PSP districts be the same as within industrial districts where a structure would not be adjacent to a residential district. Mr. Brixius indicated that he has no objection to these changes, with the specific period for administrative review to be determined. Mr. Johnson suggested caution with respect to certain areas that might include public playgrounds or other public use areas where the setback distance would be more critical. Mr. Brixius pointed out that the main concern is primarily climbing of the structures; and, monopole design significantly diminishes this problem. Mr. Robinson suggested that the provision regarding certification of taxes be deleted. The consensus of the group was to eliminate that provision from the ordinance. Mr. Dunn made a MOTION to approve the telecommunications ordinance as amended above, and was supported by Mr. Robinson. Motion carried 6-0. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS There were no discussion items. Chair Schaps reminded the group of the following events: ,� Comprehensive Plan Task Force Meeting Thursday, February 19, 1998, 6:00 p.m.