My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:11:51 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 3:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/02/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 25, 1996 <br /> the Charter states that only the Mayor and two Council Members can order an investigation. In <br /> this case the City Attorney and one Council Member decided. Council Member Neal indicated <br /> his approval of the balance of the disbursements contained in the list of disbursements <br /> recommended for approval. <br /> Council Member Bergeson suggested that the above item be removed from the complete list of <br /> disbursements recommended for approval. Council Member Bergeson stated that he believes the <br /> resulting report is incomplete. <br /> Council Member Neal asked about additional charges due for this item. Mayor Landers verified <br /> that the current bill is not final. <br /> Mr. Hawkins explained that the Mayor and two Council Members are not required by the <br /> Charter to approve the ordering of such an investigation. He added that based upon his <br /> determination that probable cause existed for an investigation, he obtained a referral of an <br /> attorney qualified to conduct such an investigation and report to Mr. Hawkins whether or not <br /> additional information could be obtained. This individual reported that there was a complaint <br /> which extended beyond the City employee to Council members. Based upon that information, <br /> Mr. Hawkins reported same to the City Administrator. After the investigation was underway,he <br /> Hawkins notified Mayor Landers and Council met with the investigator to review preliminary <br /> reports. Mr. Hawkins stated that the investigation was necessary and that the bill is valid and <br /> should be paid. He also added there was an obligation on the part of the City to conduct such an <br /> investigation. <br /> Council Member Bergeson stated that the investigator was to perform a two-part function: There <br /> was to be a workplace investigation, as well as suggested options for Council action based upon <br /> the report. In Council Member Bergeson's opinion,the report as it exists is incomplete until the <br /> investigator's suggested options are presented to Council in writing. Council Member Bergeson <br /> agrees that it is not appropriate to pay the investigator's charges until the entire assignment has <br /> been completed. <br /> Council Member Bergeson moved that the proposed payment to Leonard, Street and Deihnart of <br /> $12,437.19 be tabled for further discussion, and that the remainder of the disbursements be <br /> approved. <br /> Mayor Landers agreed that the report is incomplete. <br /> Mr. Hawkins asked if the investigator's reference to "approaches to remedial action" was the <br /> information now being requested to complete this assignment. Council Member Bergeson <br /> responded yes, adding that with regard to personnel matters, complete data in writing should be <br /> provided. <br /> Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.