My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1990 - 1998 Park Board Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
02/02/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 1:11:51 PM
Creation date
7/9/2021 3:38:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
02/02/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 27, 1997 <br /> Mayor Landers asked if phasing is proposed for this development. Mr. Brixius indicated that <br /> phasing is not in place; however, he added that if the access from the north provided in the <br /> preliminary plat is not possible at this time,the northern one-third of the subdivision(north of <br /> 79th Street)would be established as a future phase (outlot)until such time as a northerly access <br /> is available. <br /> Consideration of FIRST READING, Ordinance No.32 -97, Rezone Highland Meadows <br /> (4/5ths Vote) - Council Member Lyden moved to deny Ordinance No. 32 -97. For lack of a <br /> second,the motion failed. <br /> Council Member Kuether moved to approve the FIRST READING of Ordinance No. 32 - 97, as <br /> presented. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried, with Council <br /> Member Lyden voting no. <br /> Ken Gust, a local civil engineer, expressed reluctance to take responsibility for overlay of <br /> Marilyn. He stated that maintenance should be done,but not at the expense of the developer. <br /> Council Member Kuether stated that the residents are entitled to an overlay, given the increase in <br /> traffic they will have to endure. <br /> Mr. Gust indicated that the developer might be willing to share in the cost, but did not wish to be <br /> responsible for the entire amount. <br /> Mr. Ahrens agreed that a considerable increase in traffic will exist as a result of this <br /> ,..� development, and did not feel that a$12,000 overlay would be inappropriate. <br /> Planned Unit Development(4/5ths Vote) - Council Member Lyden moved to deny the planned <br /> unit development. For lack of a second,the motion failed. <br /> Council Member Bergeson moved to approve the planned unit development. Council Member <br /> Kuether seconded the motion. Motion carried, with Council Member Lyden voting no. <br /> Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment(4/5ths Vote) - Council Member Kuether <br /> moved to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Council Member Neal seconded the <br /> motion. Motion carried,with Council Member Lyden voting no. <br /> Preliminary Plat for Highland Meadows (4/5ths Vote) - Council Member Kuether moved to <br /> approve the preliminary plat for Highland Meadows, according to the conditions outlined above. <br /> Council Member Neal seconded the motion. <br /> Council Member Lyden stated that this effort to put in an additional 100+homes is <br /> counterproductive to the City's aims for economic vitality and property tax relief for its residents. <br /> Council Member Bergeson pointed out that this development allows for considerable flexibility <br /> on the part of the developer and, therefore, road overlay is not unreasonable. <br /> Motion carried, with Council Member Lyden voting no. <br /> ^ Mayor Landers called for a recess at 8:21 P.M. <br /> The meeting was reconvened at 8:34 P.M. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.