Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />1 <br />2 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />DATE <br />TIME STARTED <br />TIME ENDED <br />MEMBERS PRESENT <br />MEMBERS ABSENT <br />APPROVED <br />CTTY OF LINO LAKES <br />MINUTES <br />June 7, 2021 <br />5:00 P.M. <br />8:20 p.m. <br />Council Member Stoesz, Lyden, Rubland, <br />Cavegn and Mayor Rafferty <br />None <br />Staff members present: Cij� Administrator Sarah Cotton; Finance Director Hannah <br />Lynch; Director of Public Services Rick DeGardner; Director of Public Safety John <br />Swenson; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br />I. (5:00 pm) Final Report on Recreation and Aquatic Center Feasibility Study <br />by Isaac Sports Group — Community Development Director Grochala introduced the <br />subject matter including the background on the former YCMA facility (see written staff <br />report). He introduced consultants Stu Isaac and Duane Proell, who gave a presentation <br />using PowerPoint (on file) that included information on the following: <br />The process and methodology used for the study; <br />ft Goals, opportunities and vision for the community rec center; <br />• Programing: immediate and long term; <br />Programming, more specifically: <br />- for older and active adults; <br />- fitness (including drawing in outside providers).- <br />- aquatics; <br />- therapy, rehab and special needs programming; <br />- learn to swim and water safety; <br />Programming, rec center schedule model; <br />Potential Program Outsourcing, finding the right program partners criteria; <br />• Possible Opportunities for Outsourced Programming: <br />- swim lesson <br />- fitness program provider; <br />Membership Model (three different scenarios of YMCA fees); found that <br />60% of Y rates was the sweet spot; <br />Recommended Membership and User Fees (table); <br />• Operating and Financial Goals; <br />• Management Models (City managed, total outsourced; hybrid options); <br />Re -Opening and Start Up Costs (city management option); <br />Financial Operating Analysis (city management and hybrid option); <br />• Year 3: City managed vs. hybrid model (cost estimate table); (also showed <br />expense and revenue estimates for year 1 and year 2) <br />Main Sources of Revenue; <br />Main Sources of Costs; <br />• Long Term Accrued Deficit; <br />