My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12/07/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
12/07/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 4:03:52 PM
Creation date
7/23/2021 9:37:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
12/07/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 7, 1998 <br /> Kim said she would like some time to think about the trail. She asked this issue be <br /> brought back to the next Council work session. <br /> RICHARD SCHREIER LEGAL STATUS, BRIAN WESSEL <br /> Dave distributed a letter from the City Attorney regarding the Richard Schreier litigation. <br /> This litigation involves the location of a new road to connect the old Otter Lake Road and <br /> the new Otter Lake Road Mr. Schreier was invited to the last work session but was not <br /> allowed to speak to the Council. Mr. Schreier was again invited this evening. Dave <br /> cautioned Council on how they respond to Mr. Schreier's presentation. Brian stated a <br /> memo has been issued from the City Attorney regarding this issue: Brian presented a <br /> written summary of the litigation that Council requested from him at the last work <br /> session. The summary gives the background regarding this issue. <br /> Kim stated the City Attorney has advised Council not to discuss this with Mr. Schreier. <br /> The City can be held liable for anything that is said. Andy noted that anything that comes <br /> from Economic Development needs to put in writing. He also stated that this is an open <br /> meeting and citizens should be allowed to speak. Kim stated that anything the Council <br /> wants to convey needs to go through the City Attorney. <br /> Mr. Schreier stated that he had never before not been able to speak directly to elected City <br /> Officials. He has spoken to Mr. Hawkins but has had no response from Brian. He stated <br /> the road would divide his property and cost too much to construct. The County has <br /> indicated that the City cannot prove the road is beneficial to the City. The issue will have <br /> to go to litigation which costs everyone too much money. Serious damage will be done if <br /> the property is severed for the road. The road location can be adjusted. He asked that the <br /> whole project be deferred. Assessments on this road are $250 per foot which, he felt was <br /> way too high. <br /> Kim stated the Council will review this issue and discuss it. She asked that Mr. Schreier <br /> leave the documents that he provided with Dave. Mr. Schreier stated that he wants to <br /> avoid a war. He indicated Mr. Hawkins has handled the issue poorly. He stated that he <br /> has nothing to say to any Council Member that would require the presence of an attorney. <br /> Kim asked that all Council Members read the documents before the October 12, 1998, <br /> meeting. <br /> DISCUSSION OF GAS FRANCHISE,DAVE PECCHIA <br /> Dave indicated Vern is not present because of the issue of competition regarding this <br /> item. An attorney will need to be involved with the negotiations. Dave stated he would <br /> n like to speak with Mr. Shae, an attorney,to determine what is public and what would <br /> constitute a winning strategy. He indicated he would like to speak to the City of Blaine <br /> to see how they negotiated their utility franchises. Dave asked if the Council wants this <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.