Laserfiche WebLink
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> October 14, 1998 <br /> Page 14 <br /> Mr. Corson reviewed the situation with 800 some acres in Blaine that were considered <br /> wetlands by the Corp of Engineers but the poor soils were removed and it is now being <br /> developed into a golf course and residential development. He stated the City needs to be <br /> careful about making decisions based on unsuitable soils because things can change. Mr. <br /> Corson stated he has some experience with the Minnesota Trust and while it is good in <br /> concept, you need to donate the land plus pay a$5,000 fee plus there is a one year delay <br /> until they take it into their possession. He noted this may be an obstacle and should be <br /> used careful,possibly expediting that process. Mr. Corson reviewed a process in Ham <br /> Lake where a PUD development process is allowed but includes a requirement for open <br /> space as well. He stated his concern about not identifying density incentives but stated he <br /> believes Staff will present something appropriate. <br /> Mr. Brixius explained that when Staff drafts ordinance language the density incentives <br /> will be identified. <br /> Mr. Corson stated the lighting issue was addressed and asked that the quantity issue also <br /> be addressed. He stated he supports disbursing multi-family housing throughout the City <br /> and including mobile homes within the Code inspection program. Mr. Corson asked how <br /> soon the zoning needs to be consistent with the Land Use. Mr. Brixius stated the City has <br /> eleven months to establish zoning that is consistent. <br /> Chair Schaps suggested the Board forward all of these comments to the attention of the <br /> City Council in condensed form prior to their meeting so they can be considered prior to <br /> their action. <br /> Mr.Dunn stated this process is consistent with what was previously agreed upon. <br /> Mr. Robinson asked if the zoning should be changed on the property mentioned on Lake <br /> Drive. He stated the property was zoned commercial for many years and the City asked if <br /> they would change it to residential. The property owner agreed because the City <br /> indicated they would allow an appropriate commercial development. <br /> Mr. Johnson noted adoption of the Plan would not bind the use to that parcel. Mr. <br /> Brixius stated that is incorrect and explained that once this arrangement is completed <br /> Staff will draft regulations and language that specify zoning districts and uses within that <br /> particular district. <br /> Mr. Johnson asked if there will be no opportunity to amend the zoning identified on the <br /> map, once the Plan is adopted. Mr. Brixius stated that as time passes there are abilities <br /> for the Council to make amendments or change a land use arrangement. <br /> Mr. Dunn stated when this was discussed at the Task Force meeting, they were under the <br /> impression it would be considered spot zoning which is not allowed. He stated if this is <br /> not correct, he would entertain revising that particular property since it is conducive for �, <br />