My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/05/1998 Park Board Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Park Board
>
Park Board Meeting Packets
>
1998 Park Board Packets
>
10/05/1998 Park Board Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2021 3:46:34 PM
Creation date
7/23/2021 10:08:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park Board
Park Bd Document Type
Park Board Packet
Meeting Date
10/05/1998
Park Bd Meeting Type
Regular
Park Bd Publication Type
Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning&Zoning Board <br /> September 9, 1998 <br /> Page 14 <br /> Mr. Johnson indicated he supports the concept plan with the staff recommendations. Mr. <br /> Robinson agreed. <br /> Chair Schaps asked if a park plan is in place. Mr. Carlson went over the background of <br /> the property. He referred to a map which showed the location of the park dedication. He <br /> stated the two existing property owners are receptive to his plan. <br /> Chair Schaps asked about acreage. Mr. Carlson went over a map that showed wetland <br /> and mitigated. The wetland area has been doubled. He stated he has met with the Park <br /> Board. Trail access is on the north. There is an easement which will be driveable. <br /> Mr. Dunn asked which way the water will flow from the created ponds. Mr. Carlson <br /> indicated he can not answer that at this time. Mr. Powell stated the flow will go to the <br /> existing storm system, which is to the south. <br /> Mr. Dunn stated he felt the plan is acceptable. He indicated he would like to see a traffic <br /> analysis and figures regarding the capability of 62nd Street in its current mode. He stated <br /> specifics are needed for balance. Mr. Powell stated that in general terms, for a <br /> connection, 62nd Street will have to be upgraded. <br /> Mr. Dunn stated it will be easier to upgrade 62nd Street because it does not have to go to <br /> the voters. <br /> Mr. Schilling asked if Mr. Carlson has any problems with the conditions outlined by <br /> staff. Mr. Carlson stated he agrees that 62nd should be improved. <br /> Mr. Corson asked if the road is not put in now will there be enough lots to the south to <br /> justify the road. Mr. Carlson indicated there will not be enough lots to justify the road. <br /> Mr. Powell stated an agreement will be negotiated. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning & Zoning Board of a favorable response to the <br /> concept plan keeping in mind the folloxving issues: <br /> 1. All the land required for the extension of West Shadow Lake Road must be <br /> dedicated for that use at the time of final plat approval. The concept plan shows <br /> the street dedication are overlapping a corner of another land owner's lot. Using <br /> this piece of land will require the owner's permission. Another option is to revise <br /> the site plan so that the street dedication area is shifted to the east and does not <br /> include another owner's land. <br /> 2. The street dedication are south of the cul-de-sac should be shifted slightly to the <br /> east so that lot 8 does not extend south into a thin band of upland. This will <br /> increase the amount of buildable land on the west side of the road. N.e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.