07/06/1998 Park Board Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning&Zoning Board May 13, 1998 Page 6 development, divided by the minimum requirements, met the R-1 X standards. The frontages would not meet the R-1X standards. He stated that the proposed development would improve the area and the flow of the land. He said that some of the existing homes are small, and the new proposed homes would be consistent with the neighborhood. Sewer and water does currently go through the neighborhood, and the proposed plan far exceeds the minimums of Fox Trace, a development close by. Mr. Trehus stated that he believed the proposed development was not consistent with the area and very much out of character with the current neighborhood. Mr. Dunn said that he had visited the area several times so he could draw a fair conclusion regarding the issue. He was very impressed with the area. The homes were very well kept and maintained and he would like to see it stay that way. He stated that the sewer and water on Linda Avenue was done by chance, not choice. He felt the street would not be improved to residential quality and destroying the area for development was unfair and unreasonable. Mr. Duren stated that meeting required conditions was only part of the big picture and he was very skeptical regarding the proposed drainage plans. The Comprehensive Plan segments part of the City to remain rural and the City has an opportunity to do so with this area. He noted that a citizens survey indicated the majority of the citizens would like to preserve rural land and wildlife where there is an opportunity to do so. Mr. Schilling stated that Collova Builders and the citizens had both made good points. He felt it was not a good idea to put so many houses in one area. The developer had increased the square footage of the proposed homes, but the issue of quality also had to be addressed. The neighborhood had compromised agreeing to the R-1X zoning. Mr. Schilling hoped to pursue that option. Mr. Corson stated that the RAX zoning was more appropriate in this area that R-1. He complimented Collova Builders for working so closely with the residents. Mr. Johnson agreed that R-1 X would be more appropriate than R-1, due to the nature of the street, vegetation, and wildlife in the area. Chair Schaps stated that it was nice to see so many residents concerned with the area that they live in. He also thanked Collova Builders for doing a good job. He felt it was appropriate to have a larger frontage, and it could be done. Chair Schaps noted this would result in the loss of one lot, but the neighborhood would be happier. Mr. Corson made a MOTION to approve the application of the rezone from R-Rural to Rl-X for all of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 2 Arthur E. Thom Addition and Lots 47 and 48 of Block 1, Arthur E. Thorm Addition, and was supported by Mr. Dunn.